Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Taylor v. Entergy Corp., 816 So. 2d 933.

26 citing documents.

Andre Lee v. Smitty's Supply, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 4th Cir. 4/ 17/ 02)
In Re: Dana Broussard Medical Review Panel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 4/17/02), [, 941] ( (La.App.
Sanctuary Capital, LLC, on Behalf of North Louisiana Bidco, LLC v. Richard D. Cloud, James Randolph Garner, and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), citing 19 Frank L. Maraist, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Evidence and Proof, § 4.3 (1999).
Cooper v. Chamberlain 266 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), , 941, this Court explained the uncalled witness rule as follows: The "uncalled witness" rule has been defined as an adverse presumption that arises when "a party has the power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction or occurrence" and fails to call such witnesses.
S.L.B. v. C.E.B. 252 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), , 941.
Lincoln v. Acadian Plumbing & Drain, LLC 247 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), , 940 ; See also Dupree v. City of New Orleans , 99-3651 (La.
Ronda Maxwell Hudson v. Clint Tucker Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 4/17/02), (alteration in original).
Hudson v. Strother 246 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 4/17/02) , , 941 (alteration in original).
Thompson v. Bank One of Louisiana, NA 134 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/17/02) , ( (La.App.
Katie Tidwell v. Premier Staffing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Tidwell v. Premier Staffing, Inc. 127 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Melissa Horacek v. Davelyn Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Horacek v. Watson 86 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 4/17/02) , ( (La.App.
Brooks v. Reimonenq 44 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Bradley Chenvert v. Willis B. Ryland, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
CHENVERT v. Ryland 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Diana Istre Francis v. Michael G. Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Francis v. Francis 981 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Roth v. New Hotel Monteleone, LLC 978 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir. 4/17/02), , this Court explained the uncalled witness rule as follows: The "uncalled witness" rule has been defined as an adverse presumption that arises when "a party has the power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction or occurrence" and fails to call such witnesses.
Post v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 926 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Driscoll v. Stucker 893 So. 2d 32 La. 2005
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. 857 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 4/17/02), -40 ( and finding defendant's acknowledgement that hole was created by its personnel resulted in case being governed solely by La.
Farrell v. Pierre 846 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
4th Cir.4/17/02), , the court explained: The "uncalled witness" rule has been defined as an adverse presumption that arises when "a party has the power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction or occurrence" and fails to call such witnesses.
Dixon v. Travelers Ins. Co. 842 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 4/17/02), , stating: it is "an adverse presumption that arises when `a party has the power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction or occurrence' and fails to call such witnesses."
Peter Vicari General Contractor, Inc. v. St. Pierre 831 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
4th Cir.4/17/02), , the court noted: The "uncalled witness" rule has been defined as an adverse presumption that arises when "a party has the power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction or occurrence" and fails to call such witnesses....
In Re Triss 820 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 4/17/02), ( (La.App.