DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fink v. Bryant, 801 So. 2d 346.

249 citing documents.

  • Ourso v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 998 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; B & C Elec, Inc. v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • Patin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND OVERSIGHT BD. 991 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 931; Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987 pp. 3-4 (La.11/28/01), -49 .
  • Williams v. Parish of St. Bernard 984 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.11/29/01), .
  • York v. Succession of Polk 983 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-987 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Earline York v. Succession of Juliette B. Polk La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • BG & G INVESTORS VI, LLC v. Thibaut HG Corp. 985 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 5/8/02), ; Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Bunge North America, Inc. v. Board of Commerce & Industry and Dept. of Economic Dev. 991 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Becnel v. Grodner 982 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 3 (La.11/29/01), .
  • M. Hayes & Associates Realty v. Moliere 982 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 3-4 (La.11/28/01), -349 .
  • Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), City of New Orleans at p. 28, 640 So.2d at 253.
  • Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City ofNew Orleans at p. 28, 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Elta Moss v. Winfred Thomas Barrett III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    This Court explained the standard of review of the sustainment or denial of a peremptory exception of no cause of action in Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987, (La.11/29/01), : The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Moss v. Barrett 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    This Court explained the standard of review of the sustainment or denial of a peremptory exception of no cause of action in Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, (La.11/29/01), : The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Kinchen v. Livingston Parish Council 967 So. 2d 1137 La. 2007
    STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court explained the standard of review of the sustainment or denial of a peremptory exception of no cause of action in Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, (La.11/29/01), : The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Meckstroth v. La. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 962 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 06-1181, p. 8 (La.3/9/07), , 1069 In his amended petition, Mr. Meckstroth states that he (his home) was identified by DOTD as a receiver of sufficient noise to warrant a sound barrier; that such a barrier would be reasonable to build; but, that because the a
  • Jade McCann Barnes v. Paul D. Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Barnes v. Barnes 957 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-987, p. 7 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans at p. 28 , 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP 950 So. 2d 641 La. 2007
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690, p. 28 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Raspanti v. Litchfield 946 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Kimberly Johnson v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    11/28/01), City of New Orleans at p. 28, 640 So.2d at 253.
  • Johnson v. City of Pineville 924 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans at p. 28 , 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club 919 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 3 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Harold Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Thomas v. LIVINGSTON PARISH SHERIFF'S OFF. 923 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; B & C *666 Elec., Inc. v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • Z.U. Azhar Clinic v. Rafiq 913 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Briede v. ORLEANS PAR. DIST. ATTOR. OFFICE 907 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.11/28/01), -49 .
  • Briede v. Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office 907 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987, p. 3 (La.11/28/01), -49 .
  • Jackson v. Home Depot, Inc. 906 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/29/01), .
  • Trust for Schwegmann v. SCHWEGMANN FAMILY 905 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 3 (La.11/29/01), .
  • Dianne Bates v. Robert C. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), City of New Orleans at p. 28, 640 So.2d at 253.
  • Bates v. King 899 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans at p. 28 , 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Hoag v. State 889 So. 2d 1019 La. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 890 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans at p. 28 , 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Michael B. Sparks v. Mary Elizabeth Donovan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987, p. 3 (La.11/29/01)
  • Sparks v. Donovan 884 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987, p. 3 (La.11/29/01), .
  • Schuler v. Schuler 876 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Ramey v. DeCaire 869 So. 2d 114 La. 2004
    Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), ; City of New Orleans at p. 28 , 640 So.2d at 253 .
  • Michael Gregory Thevenot, Sr. v. Christine Dronet Thevenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Thevenot v. Thevenot 864 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    “A parent’s child support obligation is a primary continuous obligation.” Fink v. Bryant, 01-987, p. 5 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Martin v. Martin 862 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), , citing La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sherwood Alvin Hamilton, $1537.oo U.S. Currency and a Ruger R-145 .22 Pistol (Zo54032) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hamilton 858 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court has said, an exception of no cause of action is “triable on the face of the petition.” Durbin, , citing Cleco Corp. v. Johnson, 2001-0175 (La.9/18/01), ; Fink, .
  • Wells v. Standard Mortgage Corp. 865 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987 (La.11/28/01), recently stated: The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin 837 So. 2d 1207 La. 2003
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.11/29/01), .
  • Sterling v. Shirley 832 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987 (La.11/28/01); , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that an exception of no cause of action questions whether a remedy is available to anyone under the factual allegations contained in the petition.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 833 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    No one disputes the fact that “[t]he support obligation imposed on a parent is firmly entrenched in Louisiana law and is a matter of public policy.” Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987, p. 4 (La.11/28/01), .
  • Knight v. Magee 835 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/29/01), .
  • Copeland v. TREASURE CASINO, LLC 822 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Fink v. Bryant, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.11/29/01), .