Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. SNW v. Mitchell, 800 So. 2d 809.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana In the Interest of A.L. and K.L. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.D. (DOB: 09/08/05), G.D. (DOB: 04/08/08), L.S. (DOB: 05/13/10), K.G. (DOB: … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.D. and T.D. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
11/ 28/ 01), ( quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753, 102 S. Ct. 13885 1394- 1395, 71 L.Ed.2d 599, 606 1982)).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of: M.T. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
11/ 28/ 01), ( quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753, 102 S. Ct. 13889 1394- 1395, 71 L.Ed.2d 599, 606 1982)).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of B. L. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State ex rel. A.N. 243 So. 3d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State ex rel. J.S. 238 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State ex rel. A.S. 220 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. J.C. 184 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in Interest of K.R.M., supra.
State ex rel. D.W. 182 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State in the Interest of S. v. & C. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
SNW v. Mitchell, 01–2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S.Ct.
State ex rel. T.M.P. 126 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 10 (La.11/28/01), ; and State ex rel.
State in the Interest of M.A.N., N.A.N. & E.J.N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S.Ct.
State ex rel. M.A.N. 106 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 , 120 S.Ct.
State ex rel. L.D. 92 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State in Interest of Cac 85 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 10 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. K.R.M. 86 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State in the Interest of J. K. G. & J. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
11/28/01), (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65, 120 S.Ct.
State ex rel. J.K.G. 118 So. 3d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65 , 120 S.Ct.
State ex rel. J.T. 58 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
In the Interest of Atw 30 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In the Interest of Jnr 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
11/28/01), ; State in the Interest of J.W.M., 44,513 (La.
In the Matter of Jwm 15 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
S.N.W v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State, in the Interest of Dt 17 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), -15 (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
State, in Interest of Cr 996 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
11/28/01), ; State in the Interest of D.G.
State Ex Rel. Scm 986 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01),5 ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. S.C.M. 986 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La|L 1/28/01), 5 ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. A.D.W. 974 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in Interest of D.G.
State Ex Rel. Adw 974 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
SAW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in Interest of D.G.
State of Louisiana v. in the Interest of J.C., J.C., J.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State ex rel. B.H. v. A.H. 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in Interest of D.G.
State Ex Rel. BH v. AH 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in Interest of D.G.
State ex rel. J.P.A. 928 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, pp. 8-10 (La.11/28/01), -16 (alterations in original)(footnote omitted): A well-settled principle is that the “the [sic] fundamental liberty interest of natural parents in the care, custody, and management of their child does not evaporate simply because they have not been model parents.” Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
In the Interest of D.M. 928 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
In Re DM 928 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128, p. 8 (La.11/28/01), (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
State ex rel. L.R.S. 877 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), .
State ex rel. D.M. v. L.M. 830 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
art. 1035(A); State in the Interest of SNW, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), ; State in the Interest of SMW, 2000-3277 (La.2/21/01), ; State in the Interest of DSC, 35,893 (La.App.
State v. G.B.B. 824 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
SNW v. Mitchell, 01-2128, p. 10 (La.11/28/01); .
STATE IN INTEREST OF ARH v. Hines 810 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), .
State ex rel. D.S.C. v. J.C.R. 811 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), .
State ex rel. A.R.H. v. Hines 810 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
SNW v. Mitchell, 2001-2128 (La.11/28/01), .
State Ex Rel. DSC v. JCR 811 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
v. Mitchell, 01-2128 (La.11/28/01), .