Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 817 So. 2d 1131.

94 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kevin D. Bolden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bolden 103 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robinson, 01-273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Henderson 58 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State ex rel. L.R. 52 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
1105, 1110 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); State v. Robinson, 2001-0273, p. 5 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/17/02), (citations omitted)(footnote omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jude Gilbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7 5/17/02), Defendant argues the denial of his right to confront Trice violated his rights.
State v. Gilbert 41 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Further, relying on State v. Robinson, 01-273 (Lag/17/02), , Defendant argues the denial of his right to confront Trice violated his rights.
State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 5-6 (La.5/17/02), (citations omitted)(footnote omitted).
State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Anderson 33 So. 3d 882 La. 2010
State v. Griffin 30 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
On cross-examination, the questioner “has traditionally been allowed to impeach, or discredit, the witness.” State v. Draughn, 05-1825, pp. 47-48 (La.1/17/07), (quoting State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 6, (La.5/17/02), ).
State v. White 22 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 11/29/00), , reversed on other grounds, 2001-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 2001-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. CSD 4 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 9-10 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. C.S.D. & E.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 9-10 (La.5/17/02)
State v. Lawrence 5 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 5 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Sudds 998 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson , XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Narcisse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Strother 990 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), , citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Decay 989 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
537 , 169 L.Ed.2d 377 (2007), quoting State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 6 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Merwin 984 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 5 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. MICELOTTI 984 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 5 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Jim Van Nguyen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5/17/02), the supreme court stated: Confrontation errors are subject to a Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct.
State v. Delaney 975 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
at 1438 ; State v. Robinson, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ; (La.
State v. Kinsey 976 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. McGee 963 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Tittle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
`The main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross-examination.'" State *616 v. Robinson, XXXX-XXXX p. 6 (La.5/17/02), , citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Rideau 947 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
See also State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 11/29/00), , reversed on other grounds, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Taylor 905 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Jackson 904 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Williams 889 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See also, State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Taylor 887 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Leon Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Cox 876 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 9-10 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Wiley 880 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[28] See State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Robinson, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), ; State v. Smith, supra .
State v. Jackson 880 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[13] See State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Robinson, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Hills 866 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
[15] State v. Robinson, 01-0273, p. 2 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 11/29/00), , reversed on other grounds, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/17/02), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by