Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 799 So. 2d 1136.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Brett H Elmer La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    11/2/01), (stating that an appellate court should refrain from employing error patent review to set aside a guilty plea about which the defendant makes no complaint, and which results in a disposition of the case favorable to the defendant (citing State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.
  • State v. Clement 101 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See also Turner, 10-995 at 6, 75 So.3d at 494 (citing State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam)).
  • State v. Fullilove 81 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    But, the Louisiana Supreme Court has stated, “[a]n appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the cases favorable to the defendant.” State v. Campbell, 01-329 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Turner 75 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Caccioppo 61 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    However, “[a]n appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the cases favorable to the defendant.” State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State v. Richardson 33 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 2/11/03), , *910 865, writ denied, 03-0805 (La.10/17/03), (citing State v. Campbell, 01-0329, p. 1 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam)).
  • State v. Fontenberry 27 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    However, “[a]n appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the cases favorable to the defendant.” State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (citing State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), ).
  • Followed State v. Smith 1 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    We follow the principles enunciated |4in State v. Campbell, 01-0829 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam) and State v. Williams, 00-1725, pp. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), .
  • State v. Thomas 983 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, "An appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the cases favorable to the defendant."
  • State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Walton 957 So. 2d 133 La. 2007
    Cf. State v. Robinson, 06-1406 (La.12/8/06), (appellate courts should refrain from setting aside guilty pleas resulting in dispositions favorable to the defendant on the basis of defects about which the defendant does not complain); State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (same); State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), (same).
  • State v. Nicholas 958 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 1/3/01) , , judgment vacated in part by 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), , cases involving warrantless automobile searches.
  • State v. Anderson 945 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Campbell, 01-329, p. 1 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Collins 890 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    We elect not to disturb defendant's sentences, based on the Louisiana Supreme Court's edict in State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), (per curiam): "The appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in dispositions of the case favorable to the defendant."
  • State v. Grant 887 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/11/03) , , writ denied, 03-805 (La.10/17/03), , citing State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State v. Quinones 864 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    We note that the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following in State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01), : The appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in disposition of the case favorable to the defendant.
  • State v. Green 860 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [12] 01-329 (La.11/2/01), .
  • State v. Massey 841 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    We note that the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following in State v. Campbell, 01-0329 (La.11/2/01) : The appellate court should refrain from employing errors patent review to set aside guilty pleas about which the defendant makes no complaint and which resulted in disposition of the case favorable to the defendant.