Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sylvester, 826 So. 2d 1106.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
9/20/02), (alteration in original, (La.
State v. Farber 263 So. 3d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
e determination of reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer’s subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all of [the] circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.”), citing Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1; 699 So.2d at 880 ; State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02); (“In determining whether police officers have a particularized and objective basis for conducting an
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Sylvester, 01-0607, p. 3 (La.9/20/02), ; State v. Harris, 11-0941, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Jones 128 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 *447 (1991); State v. Sylvester, 01-607, p. 3 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Alberti 128 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “[ujnder Louisiana’s slightly broader definition of the term, a seizure may also occur ‘when the police come upon an individual with such force that, regardless of the individual’s attempt to flee or elude the encounter, an actual stop of the individual is virtually certain [to occur].’ ” State v. Sylvester, 01-607 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Magee 110 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02), ; State v. Parker, 97-1994, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Foster 108 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
This court has held, “[u]nder Louisiana’s slightly broader definition of the term, a seizure may also occur ‘when the police come upon an individual with such force that, regardless of the individual’s attempt to flee or elude the encounter, an actual stop of the individual is virtually certain [to occur].’ ” State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607, p. 3 (La.9/20/02)
State v. Cure 93 So. 3d 1268 La. 2012
State v. Sylvester, 01-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02), (“In determining whether police officers have a ‘particularized and objective basis’ for conducting an investigatory stop, reviewing courts ‘must look at the totality of the circumstances of each case,’ a process which ‘allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences f
State ex rel. C.S. 106 So. 3d 93 La. 2012
State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 5 (La.6/27/03), ) (police had reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop based on an apparent curfew violation because defendant looked “very young” although he was in fact 18 years old); State v. Sylvester, 01-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02), (“In determining whether police officers have a ‘particularized and objective basis’ for conducting an investigatory stop, reviewing courts ‘must look at the totality of the circumstances of each case,’ a process which ‘allows office
State v. Martin 79 So. 3d 951 La. 2011
This court has held, “[ujnder Louisiana’s slightly broader definition of the term, a seizure may also occur ‘when the police come upon an individual with such force that, regardless of the individual’s attempt to flee or elude the encounter, an actual stop of the individual is virtually certain [to occur].’ ” State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607, p. 3 (La.9/20/02)
State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The trial court’s January 7, 2009, judgment indicates that it relied upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607 (La.9/20/02), , as support for denying the defendant’s motion.
State v. Wilson 28 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sylvester, 01-607 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Turner 13 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1547 , 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991); State v. Sylvester, 01-607, p. 3 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Bozeman 6 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Sylvester, 2001-0607, pp. 5-6 (La.9/20/02), (per cu-riam).
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Consider, by way of contrast, State v. Sylvester, 01-0607 (La.9/20/02), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court found a police encounter became an investigatory stop when the police officer ordered the defendant to place his hands on a car "and [the defendant] complied, thereby submitting to the officer’s assertion of authority.” Sylvester , 01-0607 at 4, 826 So.2d at 1108 (emphasis in the
State v. Woods 982 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Sylvester, 01-607, p. 4 (La.9/20/02), (per curiam).
State v. Hunter 925 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In State v. Sylvester, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/20/02), , officers were patrolling an area where there had been complaints of drug activity.
State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
See, State v. Sylvester, 01-607 (La.9/20/02), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Hopkins 891 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
at 2386; State v. Sylvester, 01-607 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Collins 890 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See also, State v. Sylvester, 01-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Long 884 So. 2d 1176 La. 2004
at 2386; State v. Sylvester, 01-607 (La.9/20/02), .
State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Anthony Sylvester, 2001-0607 (La.9/20/2002), .