Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 824 So. 2d 344.
- State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Gomila La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Distinguished State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Miner
163 So. 3d 132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
waived any |⅜error from this omission.”); State v. Allen, 01-2494, p. 1 (La.6/21/02), (per curiam) (“A defendant must raise a claim that the indictment does not provide adequate notice of the charge before trial by filing a bill of particulars.
-
State v. Perkins
155 So. 3d 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Allen, 2001-2494, p. 1 (La.6/21/02), , “[A] defendant may not raise the sufficiency of an indietment for the first time after conviction ...
-
State v. Staden
154 So. 3d 579
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
673, 678 , 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983); State v. Allen, 01-2494 (La.6/21/02), .
-
State v. Reel
126 So. 3d 506
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
especially when the charging document fairly informed him of the charge against him and the alleged defect did not prejudice him.” State v. Allen, 2001-2494, p. 1 (La.6/21/02), .
-
State v. Brown
99 So. 3d 684
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/31/11) , , writ denied, 11-1366 (La.12/16/11), (citing State v. Allen, 01-2494 (La.6/21/02), ).
-
State v. Suggs
70 So. 3d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Allen, 01-2494 (La.6/21/02), .
-
State v. Nicholas
67 So. 3d 610
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 841; State v. Allen, 01-2494 (La.6/21/02), .
-
State v. Jackson
976 So. 2d 279
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See and compare State v. Allen, 2001-2494 (La.6/21/02), , (La.App.
-
Suazo v. Suazo
970 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In State v. Allen, 01-2494, p. 1 (La.6/21/02), , the supreme court held that by failing to allege that an indictment provides inadequate notice of the charge prior to trial, the defendant had waived the claim.
- State of Louisiana v. Billy Frank Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Jackson
866 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
especially when the charging document fairly informed him of the charge against him and the alleged defect did not prejudice him.” State v. Allen, 01-2494, p. 1 (La.6/21/02), .