DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bishop, 835 So. 2d 434.

123 citing documents.

  • State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/14/03), , 437 and State v. Caliste , 12-0533, p. 9 (La.
  • State v. Carter 246 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1/14/03), supported his position that an indictment which alleged attempted second degree murder must state that specific intent to kill was an element of the crime.
  • State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/14/03), , supported his position that an indictment which alleged attempted second degree murder must state that specific intent to kill was an element of the crime.
  • State v. Lewis 245 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. McGill 213 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Hust 214 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Christopher 209 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    1/14/03), ; State v. Logan, 45,136 (La.App.
  • State v. Rose 206 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Hickman 194 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    14:27; 14:30.1; State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Clements 194 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Washington 188 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. Murray, 49,418 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/15), .
  • State v. Johnson 187 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the , offense and the actions of the defendant, see State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), , and “can be formed in an instant.” State v. Rivers, 14-0511, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Patterson 184 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Murray, 49,418 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/15), .
  • State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances and the defendant’s actions.” State v. Everrett, 11-0714, p. 14 (La.6/13/12), ; State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Casaday 162 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1/14/03), ; State v. Coleman, 12-1408, p. 9 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 152 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548 (La.01/14/03), .
  • State v. Johnson 151 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense and the conduct of the defendant.” State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), (Citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1/14/03), the supreme court addressed the elements of the crime of attempted second degree murder, stating: To sustain a conviction for attempted second degree murder, the state must prove that the defendant: (1) intended to kill the victim; and (2) committed an overt act tending toward the ac
  • State v. Wilson 157 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), , the supreme court addressed the elements of the crime of attempted second degree murder, stating: To sustain a conviction for attempted second degree murder, the state must prove that the defendant: (1) intended to kill the victim; and (2) committed an overt act tending toward the accomplishment of the victim’s
  • State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Wilson 135 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    14:27; 14:30.1; State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; State ex rel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The supreme court also followed Hongo in State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Caliste 125 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense and the conduct of the defendant.” State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 2/10/10), , citing State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; La.
  • State v. Cortez 122 So. 3d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Logan, 45,136 (La.App.2d Cir.4/14/10), , unit denied, 2010-1099 (La.11/5/10), .
  • State v. Dunn 119 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Byrd 119 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; (under La.Rev.Stat.
  • State v. Ross 115 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    14:10(1); State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Authorlee 111 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    14:30.1; State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher K. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    1/14/03), State v. Brown, 07-388 (La.App.
  • State v. Mayeux 128 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    12/02/97), ; State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Brown, 07-388 (La.App.
  • State v. Galle 107 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Martin 92 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; State ex rel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    1/14/03), the defendant argued there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for attempted second degree murder.
  • State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03), , the defendant argued there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for attempted second degree murder.
  • State v. MacK 46 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.01/14/03), .
  • State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Johnson 33 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Bishop, 01-2548, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; La.
  • State v. Williams 32 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Bishop, 2001-2548 *906 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Harris 22 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    14:30.1; State v. Bishop, 2001-2548 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Landry 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009