DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Carmouche, 872 So. 2d 1020.

76 citing documents.

  • State v. Edwards 17 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2572 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992); State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Rankin, 41,128 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Joseph John La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/14/02), the supreme court stated: -9- Louisiana’s statutory scheme for detecting mental incapacity jealously guards a defendant’s right to a fair trial.
  • State v. John 11 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/14/02), , the supreme court stated: Louisiana's statutory scheme for detecting mental incapacity jealously guards a defendant's right to a fair trial.
  • State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.05/14/02), .
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    In State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, pp. 29-31(La.05/14/02), -1042 , this Court set forth the legal standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is competent to stand trial as follows: A criminal defendant has a constitutional right not to be tried while legally incompetent.
  • State v. Hall 986 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    P. art. 419 A; State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    The proper legal standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is competent to stand trial was set forth in State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX p. 29-31 (La.5/14/02), -1042 , as follows: A criminal defendant has a constitutional right not to be tried while legally incompetent.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX,(La.5/14/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 p. 20 (La.5/14/02)
  • State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX p. 20 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Dupree 950 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)]; State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), .
  • Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
    617, 623 , 88 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) (holding that racial discrimination in petit jury selection is a structural error not subject to harmless error analysis); State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Rankin 938 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)]; State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
    State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX p. 20 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. King 922 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Johnson, 03-620 (La.
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    art. 797(2),(4); Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 11 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Price 917 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    It cites State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), , in which the supreme court held that a trial court's ruling on a motion for mistrial lies within its sound discretion and will not be over-turned absent manifest abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Parker 901 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Johnson, 03-620 (La.App.
  • State v. Swain 900 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Id.; State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [12] State v. Kang, 859 So.2d at 652 [13] State v. Carmouche, 01-405 (La.5/14/02), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Anderson 889 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Cowden 889 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Carmouche, 01-405 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Williams 889 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [3] State v. Carmouche, 01-405 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
    This Court affirmed the first degree murder conviction and death sentence rendered by the jury in State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; reh'g granted (La.9/25/03) (case remanded to consider issue of mental retardation in light of Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct.