Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 838 So. 2d 729.

131 citing documents.

State v. Rapp 161 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , quoting Colomb , 98-2813, p. 3, 747 So.2d at 1076 , explained res gestae: Res gestae events constituting other crimes are deemed admissible because they are so nearly connected to the charged offense that the state could not *112 accurately present its case without reference to them.
State v. Parks 165 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , (citing State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), -42 ).
State v. Falkins 146 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
n also incorporates a rule of narrative completeness by which, “the prosecution may fairly seek to place its evidence before the jurors, as much to tell a story of guiltiness as to support an inference of guilt, to convince the jurors a *852 guilty verdict would be morally reasonable as much as to point to the discrete elements of a defendant’s legal fault.” State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.l/14/03), (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. at 188, 117 S.Ct.
State v. Richardson 142 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Hankton 140 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
02), , “[t]he Miranda right to counsel is a prophylactic rule that does not operate independent from the danger it seeks to protect against, i.e., the compelling atmosphere inherent in the process of in-custody interrogation, and the effect that danger can have on a suspect’s privilege to avoid compelled self-incrimination.” See also State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), (Miranda “protects an individual’s Fifth Amendment privilege during incommunicado interrogation in a police-controlled
State v. Jordan 145 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, pp. 10-11 (La.1/14/03), -42 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained this exception: Generally, courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show defendant is a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
A “Generally, courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show [a] defendant is a man of bad character who has acted in conformity [therewith].” State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , citing State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), -42 .
State v. Napoleon 119 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , writ denied, 04-1285 (La.10/15/04), (quoting State v. Taylor 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), cert.
State v. Kato 157 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert, denied, 640 U.S. 1103 , 124 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Acker 111 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-13 (La.1/14/03), -43 , cert.
State v. Girard 110 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Using the doctrine of “res ges-tae ” ‘the State complete^] the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.’ State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), (quoting State v. Colomb, 98-2813, p. 3 (La.10/1/99), , ).
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
15 In State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , the Court further explained the admissibility of res gestae and evidence of “other crimes, wrongs, or acts” pursuant to La.
State v. Hugle 104 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding.” “Res gestae events constituting other crimes are deemed admissible because they are so nearly connected to the charged offense that the state could not accurately present its case without reference to them.” State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1602 (1966)] ―protects an individual‘s Fifth Amendment privilege during incommunicado interrogation in a police-controlled atmosphere.‖ State v. Leger, 05–0011, p. 13 (La.7/10/06), citing State v. Taylor, 01–1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) ] “protects an individual’s Fifth Amendment privilege during incommunicado interrogation in a police-controlled atmosphere.” State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 13 (La.7/10/06), , citing State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Barnes 100 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , quoting State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , this court reviewed the general law applicable to other crimes evidence as set forth by the Supreme Court in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-11 (La.1/14/03), , 741-42: Generally, courts may not admit evidence of other crimes to show defendant is a man of bad character who has acted in conformity with his bad character.
State v. Napolean 87 So. 3d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
*132 In State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), -42 , cert.
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
See State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 22 (La.1/14/03), (admitting improper 11fievidence “which is merely corroborative and cumulative of other properly introduced evidence is harmless [error]”).
State v. Massey 71 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In brief, Defendant argues that the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Reynolds 55 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Taylor, 2001-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Taylor, 01-1688 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Charles D. Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, p. 22 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Williams 47 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), -42 , c ert.
State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Sumrall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Sumrall 34 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the admissibility of other crime evidence when it relates to conduct formerly known as res gestae in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-12 (La.1/14/03), -43 , c ert.
State v. Anderson 38 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), -42 , c ert.
State v. Hyman 33 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Keller 30 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Hunt 25 So. 3d 746 La. 2009
Suppression of the Custodial Statement It is well-settled the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona, supra, “protects an individual’s Fifth Amendment privilege during incommunicado interrogation in a police-controlled atmosphere.” State v. Leger, 05-0011, p. 13 (La.7/10/06), , citing State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Murphy 28 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-11 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Senegal 19 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), -42 , cert denied, 540 U.S. 1103 , 124 S.Ct.
State v. Chaisson 20 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-17 (La.1/14/03), -45 , cert.
State v. Ridgley 7 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Clyde Milton Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-12 (La.1/14/03), -43 , cert.