Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 815 So. 2d 809.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
4/26/02), 2 But a startled reaction or flight alone, without more, is insufficient.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Causey 108 So. 3d 1163 La. 2012
2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)), the police may “draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that ‘might well elude an untrained person,’ ” State v. Johnson, 01-2081, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), (quoting United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Thompson 93 So. 3d 553 La. 2012
e totality of the circumstances of each case,’ a process which ‘allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available *569 to them that might well elude an untrained person.’ ” State v. Boudoin, 2010-2868, p. 1 (La.3/4/11); , citing State v. Johnson, 2001-2081, p. 2 (La.4/26/02); , 811 and United State v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Eaglin AKA Eaglin Thomas AKA Thomas H. Eaglin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Morgan 59 So. 3d 403 La. 2011
at 695 ); State v. Johnson, 01-2081 (La.4/26/02); ; State v. Benjamin, 97-3065 (La.12/1/98); .
State v. Boudoin 56 So. 3d 233 La. 2011
reviewing courts ‘must look at the totality of the circumstances of each case,’ a process which ‘allows officers to draw fion their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that might well elude an untrained person.’ ” State v. Johnson, 01-2081, p. 2 *235 (La.4/26/02), (quoting United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 47 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also State v. Johnson, 01-2081(La.4/26/02), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court found reasonable suspicion based on the defendant’s, nervousness, the lateness of the hour, and the fact that defendant quickened his pace as the police approached in a marked unit in a high crime area.
State v. Jackson 42 So. 3d 368 La. 2010
We thereby accord due deference to the officer’s training and expertise, State v. Johnson, 01-2081, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), (police may “draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that ‘might well elude an untrained person’ ”) (quoting United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Loeb 34 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
01-2081 (La.4/26/02), (per curiam).
State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/26/02), (“The assessment by a reviewing court of the cumulative information known to the officers avoids a ‘divide-and-conquer analysis’ by which the whole becomes less than the sum of its parts because each circumstance examined individually may appear ‘readily susceptible to an innocent explanation.’ ”) (quoting Arvizu
State of Louisiana v. Davy C. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/26/02), State v. Jackson, 26,138 (La.App.
State v. Harris 21 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 1/29/03) , ; State v. Johnson, 01-2081 (La.4/26/02), ; State v. Jackson, 26,138 (La.App.
State v. Pratt 16 So. 3d 1163 La. 2009
had taught him, that in the narcotics trade, ‘when it’s done outside, it’s done very fast and from one hand to the next.’ ”) (citation omitted); cf. State v. Johnson, 01-2081, p. 3, (Police may “draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions | ¡¡about the cumulative information available to them that ‘might well elude an untrained person.’ ”)(quoting United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 1 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Johnson, 2001-2081, pp. 2-3 (La.4/26/02), .
State v. Fearheiley 979 So. 2d 487 La. 2008
1758, 1763 , 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984), courts must take into account the totality of the circumstances in a process that allows the police "`to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that "might well elude an untrained person."'" State v. Johnson, 01-2081, p. 3, (quoting United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In support of this contention, the State directs this Court’s attention to State v. Johnson, 01-2081 (La.4/26/02), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld a finding of reasonable suspicion based upon the defendant’s nervousness, flight, reputation of an area, and the lateness of the hour.
State v. Warmack 973 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000), and State v. Johnson, 01-2081 (La.4/26/02), (per curiam), this Court determined that the defendant's unprovoked flight from the officers in a high-crime area provided the requisite reasonable suspicion to justify the investigatory stop.
State v. Hunter 925 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Likewise, in State v. Johnson, 2001-2081 (La.4/26/02), , officers on patrol in a housing project saw the defendant and his friend walking.
State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Another similar case is the Louisiana Supreme Court case of State v. Johnson, 01-2081 (La.4/26/02), 812 .
State v. Burns 877 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[18] 01-2081 (La.4/26/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Charles E Morris, Glenivan Cottle and Donell Badgett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
4/26/02), the court stated: In determining whether the police possessed the requisite “‘minimal level of objective justification’” for an investigatory stop based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7, 109 S.Ct.
State v. Morris 854 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In State v. Johnson, 01-2081, pp. 2-3 (La.4/26/02), , 811 the court stated: In determining whether the police possessed the requisite “‘minimal level of objective justification’ ” for an investigatory stop based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Cojoe 828 So. 2d 1101 La. 2002
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)); State v. Johnson, 01-2081 p. 3 (La.4/26/02), ("The assessment by a reviewing court of the cumulative information known to the officers avoids a `divide-and-conquer analysis' by which the whole become less than the sum of its parts because each circumstance examined individually may appear `readily susceptible to an innocent explanation.'") (quoting Arvizu
State v. Sylvester 826 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)); State v. Johnson, 01-2081 p. 3 (La.4/26/02), ("The assessment by a reviewing court of the cumulative information known to the officers avoids a `divideand-conquer analysis' by which the whole becomes less than the sum of its parts because each circumstance examined individually may appear `readily susceptible to an innocent explanation.'") (quoting Arvizu
State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000); State v. Johnson, 2001-2081 (La.4/26/02), .