Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Zachary, 829 So. 2d 405.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Morehead La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/25/02), in this regard.
State v. Morehead 239 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/25/02), , 3 in this regard.
State v. Casaday 223 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/25/02), ; State v. Small, 50,388 (La.App.
State v. Golden 126 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
n the State “introduces anything less than a ‘perfect’ transcript, the trial judge must weigh the evidence submitted by the defendant and the State to determine whether the State met its burden of proving that defendant’s prior guilty plea was informed and voluntary and made with an articulated waiver of his Boykin rights.” Shelton, supra; see also State v. Zachary, 2001-3191, p. 3 (La.10/25/02), (“Under the court’s present jurisprudence, to use a prior guilty plea to enhance punishment under La
State v. Henderson 110 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Zachary, 2001-3191 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Douglas 72 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), (per curiam).
State v. Jones 35 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Zachary, 01-3191, p. 3 (La.10/25/02), (per curiam), -80 (La.1993); State v. Fleming, 04-1218, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Zachary 995 So. 2d 631 La. 2008
State v. Zachary 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
10/25/02), (per curiam).
State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Id.; State v. Zachary, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Darensbourg 948 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), , -780 (La.1993).
State v. Tomlinson 916 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), , 407 -780 (La.1993).
State v. LeBlanc 897 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In State v. Zachary, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/25/02), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed whether an out of state nolo contendere plea satisfied the burden of invoking the enhanced sentencing provisions of the habitual offender statute.
State v. Uloho 875 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), , -80 (La.1993).
State v. Deville 879 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR The state argues that under State v. Carlos, 98-1366 (La.7/7/99), and State v. Zachary, 01-3191 (La.10/25/02), (per curiam), it only needed to prove the fact of conviction and that defendant waived counsel at the time he entered his plea in order to use a prior guilty plea to establish a predicate offense under the DWI statute.
State v. Townsend 859 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Zachary, 2001-3191 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Robinson 846 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:529.1; State v. Zachary, 01-3191, p. 5 (La.10/25/02), ; State v. Mims, 00-1507, pp. 11-12 (La.App.