DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mayeux, 820 So. 2d 526.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Day 838 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    First is State v. Michael J. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Joseph 836 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    In State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that, with regard to La.
  • State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See State v. Mayeux, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/21/02), (noting well-settled general rule that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty).
  • State v. Wilson 833 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    (citing State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02); ) (footnote omitted) (emphasis added).
  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Id., citing State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Brister 829 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    A recent supreme court case, State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02); , held that for the purposes of La.R.S.
  • State v. Griffin 830 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    *379 In accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), , we vacate the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing.
  • State v. Wiltcher 830 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    [2] The recent case of State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), , applied the penalty provision of the 2001 amendment to La.
  • State v. Bagneris 830 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Mayeux, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/21/2002), , (applying 2001 amendment to LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Sanders 827 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02); , however, the supreme court recently found this rule inapplicable insofar as it relates to the amendments to La.R.S.
  • State v. Shivers 827 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    A recent supreme court case, State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02); , held that for the purposes of La.R.S.
  • State v. Fleming 825 So. 2d 1168 La. 2002
    *1169 See State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that, based on the language used in the new statute, the new La.
  • State v. Nelson 823 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with State v. Mayeux, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/21/02), .
  • State v. Sugasti 820 So. 2d 518 La. 2002
    6/21/02), , decided on the same day as the instant case, that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant under the penalty provisions of LA.