DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Arnold, 816 So. 2d 289.

24 citing documents.

  • State v. Stevens 260 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4/12/02), ; State v. Miller , 12-126 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    4/12/02), in support of its claim.
  • State v. Lowrey 228 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/12/02), , in support of its claim.
  • State v. Engle 213 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/12/02), ; State v. Miller, 12-126 (La.
  • State v. Miller 102 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin N. Rivera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Garcia 66 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State v. Jenkins 57 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), , citing, United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Sepulvado 25 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Arnold, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Eulicee Jamar Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4/12/02), that while “[g]enerally, guilty pleas constitute a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects,” double jeopardy claims are an exception to that rule.
  • State v. Landfair 979 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [3] State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 569 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stevenson 982 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), (per curiam) reaffirmed that in general, guilty pleas constitute a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects.
  • State ex rel. Dubarry v. State 925 So. 2d 493 La. 2006
    757 , 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989); State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State Ex Rel. Williams v. State 922 So. 2d 526 La. 2006
    Because the face of the pleadings, see State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), , shows that relator's convictions of attempted armed robbery and attempted first degree murder of the same victim in the same incident violate double jeopardy principles, United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 575-76 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Smith 883 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), , the court stated: Generally, guilty pleas constitute a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects, see, and generally courts review them only to ensure that the plea "was both counseled and voluntary."
  • State of Louisiana v. Robet Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/12/02), the court stated: Generally, guilty pleas constitute a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects, see, and generally courts review them only to ensure that the plea “was both counseled and
  • State v. Gobert 865 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    [6] State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven D. Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 4/11/01) , , reversed on other grounds, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State v. Hayes 836 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Arnold, 2001-1399, p. 1 (La.4/12/02), ; see also Taylor v. Whitley, 933 F.2d 325, 327-28 (5th Cir.1991), cert.
  • State v. Wilson 827 So. 2d 1121 La. 2002
    3 Cir. 4/11/01) , , rev'd State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), .
  • State ex rel. Birtha v. State 824 So. 2d 1179 La. 2002
    Because the face of the pleadings, State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), , shows that relator’s convictions of armed robbery of one victim and attempted first degree felony murder of that same victim violate double jeopardy principles, United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 575-76 , 109 S.Ct.