DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 851 So. 2d 917.

19 citing documents.

  • Lewis v. TEMPLE INLAND 80 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 See Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 2002-0442 (La.4/21/03), (on rehearing) (per curiam) (holding that the phrase “claims due” in prior LSA-R.S.
  • Patrick D. Johnson v. Conagra Poultry Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Johnson v. CONAGRA POULTRY CO. 26 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “[I]t is well established that the underlying reason for the imposition of penalties and attorneys’ fees in the workers’ compensation arena is to combat the indifference by employers and insurers toward injured workers.” Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist, 02-439, p. 14 (La.1/14/03), , rehearing granted in part on other grounds, 02-442 (La.4/21/03), .
  • Honeycutt v. HENRY'S PLUMBING 981 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Furthermore, "[i]n Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water District, 02-439, 02-478 (La.1/14/03), , rehearing granted in part on other grounds, 02-442, 01-478 (La.4/21/03), , the supreme court held that La.R.S.
  • Steve Honeycutt v. Henry's Plumbing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4/21/03), the supreme court held that La.R.S.
  • EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINIST. v. Wallace 968 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    See Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 02-442 (La.4/21/03), .
  • Evergreen Presbyterian Ministries v. Brenda Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Adrian Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4/21/03), (wherein the supreme court explained that vocational rehabilitation is a “claim due” under then existing La.R.S.
  • Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 926 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Although the supreme court has found attorney's fees appropriate in cases involving an improper discontinuation of vocational rehabilitation, see Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 02-442 (La.4/21/03), (wherein the supreme court explained that vocational rehabilitation is a "claim due" under then existing La.R.S.
  • Juan Rivera v. M & R Cable Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/21/03), the supreme court held that La.R.S.
  • Rivera v. M & R Cable Contractors, Inc. 896 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water District, 02-439, 02-478 (La.1/14/03), , rehearing granted in part on other grounds, 02-442, 01-478 (La.4/21/03), , the supreme court held that La.R.S.
  • Don R. Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/21/03), the supreme court reiterated the well-known precept that “[a]wards of penalties in workers’ compensation cases are essentially penal in nature, being imposed to discourage indifference and the undesirable conduct of employers and insurers.” The supreme court then agreed with this court’s decision that La.R.S.
  • Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets 888 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water District, 02-439, 02-442, 02-478, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , rehearing granted on other grounds, 02-442, 02-478 (La.4/21/03), , the supreme court reiterated the well-known precept that "[a]wards of penalties in workers' compensation cases are essentially penal in nature, being imposed to discourage indifference and the undesirable conduct of employers and insurers."
  • Dallas Maynard v. Grey Wolf Drilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/21/03), (wherein the supreme court explained that vocational rehabilitation is a “claim due” under then existing La.R.S.
  • Maynard v. Grey Wolf Drilling 885 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Although the supreme court has found attorney's fees appropriate in cases involving an improper discontinuation of vocational rehabilitation, see Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 02-442 (La.4/21/03), (wherein the supreme court explained that vocational rehabilitation is a "claim due" under then existing La.R.S.
  • Floyd Boone, Jr. v. Mid-State Marketing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Boone v. Mid-State Marketing 867 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 02-0442 (La.4/21/03), .
  • Black v. Lofland Co. 869 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 02-0442 (La.4/21/03), .
  • Canizaro v. Tangipahoa Parish School System 853 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    [6] Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX, p. 2 (La.4/21/03), .