DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 837 So. 2d 1207.

250 citing documents.

  • Lazaro v. New Orleans Brass 933 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    art. 927(4) and (5); Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03); .
  • Adams v. Asbestos Corp. 930 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), ; Grocery Supply Co. v. Winterton Food Stores, 31,114 (La.App.2d Cir.12/9/98), , re hearing denied.
  • Washington v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services 927 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Knutsen v. Prince, 40,109 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/05), , (citing Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), ).
  • Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc. 929 So. 2d 1211 La. 2006
    art. 927(A)(4) and (5); Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03); .
  • Wrm v. Hcv 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • W.R.M. v. H.C v. and M.J.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03)
  • Emilsen Amador v. John F. Reggie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Amador v. Reggie 924 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0655, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), .
  • W.R.M. v. H.C.V. 923 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club 919 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Harold Schoeffler v. Drake Hunting Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Gibbs v. Delatte 927 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    P. art. 927; Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), , 1216 citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm'n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Thomas v. LIVINGSTON PARISH SHERIFF'S OFF. 923 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Knutsen v. Prince 911 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Edmonds v. City of Shreveport 910 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    art. 927(4) and (5); Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.01/28/03), ; Downs v. Hammett Properties, Inc., 39,568 (La.App.
  • Barnhill v. Remington Oil and Gas Corp. 918 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    See Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), , 1213 and the cases cited therein.
  • Creamer Brothers, Inc. v. Hicks 907 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    DISCUSSION The law applicable to consideration of an exception of no cause of action was explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Industrial Companies, Inc., v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), , as follows: First, we focus on whether the law provides a remedy against the particular defendant in this case.
  • Mason v. Luther 903 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Janie Audra Mason v. James A. Luther La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1/28/03), (citations omitted).
  • Leaming v. Century Vina, Inc. 908 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), -13 , viz: [Ajlthough they are often confused and/or improperly combined in the same exception, the peremptory exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action are separate and distinct.
  • Martin v. Martin 903 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    art. 927(4) and (5); Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.01/28/03), ; Downs v. Hammett Properties, Inc., *624 39,568 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Morton 901 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In discussing the peremptory exception of no cause of action, the Supreme Court of Louisiana in Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), , explained: The function of the peremptory exception of no cause of action is to question whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition.
  • Downs v. Hammett Properties, Inc. 899 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In Industrial Companies Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), , the supreme court explained: [A]lthough they are often confused and/or improperly combined in the same exception, the peremptory exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action are separate and distinct.
  • Vourvoulias v. Movassaghi 906 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Elmore v. Kelly 889 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), ; Jackson v. USAgencies Insurance Company, 37,317 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/03), .
  • Sam A. Daigle and Theresa M. Daigle v. Trinity United Mortgage, LLC & Joe Diez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1/28/03), La.Code Civ.P.
  • Daigle v. Trinity United Mortgage, L.L.C. 890 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Co., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), ; La.
  • In Re Succession of Ricks 893 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), ; In re Succession of Jones, 03-0238, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Cason v. Cason 886 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/28/03), ; Fortenberry, supra .
  • Michael B. Sparks v. Mary Elizabeth Donovan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Sparks v. Donovan 884 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Discussion The Louisiana Supreme Court has discussed the peremptory exception of no cause of action at length in its opinion in Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Hines v. Audio Plus, Inc. 880 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), .
  • Ferrington v. Louisiana Bd. of Parole 886 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Williams v. Williams 886 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • State of La., Dept. of Social serv.bureau of Licenses v. Adoptions Worldwide, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1/28/03), the supreme court explained: The peremptory exception of no cause of action is designed to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the particular plaintiff is afforded a remedy in law based on the facts alleged in the pleading.
  • State, Department of Social Services v. Adoptions Worldwide, Inc. 878 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    OPINION Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 931 provides in part: “No evidence *780 may be introduced at any time to support or controvert the objection that the petition fails to state a cause of action.” In Industrial Cos. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), , the supreme court explained: The peremptory exception of no cause of action is designed to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the particular plaintiff is afforded a remedy in law based on the fa
  • Gibbs v. Magnolia Living Center, Inc. 870 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • In Re Tufts Oil and Gas-III 871 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 11-12 (La.1/28/03), , 1216 citing, Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.11/30/94), .
  • ANR Pipeline Co v. Louisiana Tax Commission 868 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 2002-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Larrieu v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 872 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Simons Petroleum, Inc. v. Falgout 873 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 866 So. 2d 244 La. 2004
    art. 927; Industrial Cos., Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 12 (La.1/28/03), (citing Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015, p. 5 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • Gibson v. State 866 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), , citing, Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n, 94-2015, (La.11/30/94), .
  • Mendonca v. Tidewater Inc. 862 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the peremptory exception of no right of action as follows: Generally, an action can only be brought by a person having a real and actual interest which he asserts.
  • In Re Succession of Jones 868 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, pp. 6-7 (La.1/28/03), ; Jackson v. St.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sherwood Alvin Hamilton, $1537.oo U.S. Currency and a Ruger R-145 .22 Pistol (Zo54032) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hamilton 858 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Industrial Companies, Inc., v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Richardson v. Richardson 859 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665, p. 6 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 859 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 931; Industrial Cos. Inc. v. Durbin, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 11-12 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Jackson v. USAgencies Insurance Co. 850 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin, 02-0665 (La.01/28/03), ; Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-2015 (La.11/30/94), .