DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Bellanger, 851 So. 2d 943.

73 citing documents.

  • Thomas v. Sheridan 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Specialized Com. Lending v. Murphy-Blossman 978 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Landry v. Bellanger, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.5/20/03), .
  • Johnson v. Bergeron 966 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 6 (La.5/20/03), .
  • Corkern v. Smith 960 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The court in Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443 (La.5/20/03), , explains that art. 2323 "clearly requires that the fault of the every person responsible for a plaintiff's injuries be compared regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each person.
  • Michael J. Mestayer v. Michael J. Detraz, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/20/03), Arceneaux v. De La Rosa, 04-1057 (La.App.
  • Purvis Touchet v. Mark Hampton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/20/03), (), the supreme court defined a battery as a “harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.
  • Touchet v. Hampton 950 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 6 (La.5/20/03), ( (La.
  • Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 949 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443 (La.5/20/03), , the Supreme Court examined in detail the legislative intent of the addition of Section C to Article 2323.
  • Bridgefield Cas. Ins. Co. v. Tripp 943 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In Landry v. Bellanger, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/20/03), , the supreme court stated that a battery is harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to receive such a contact.
  • Yokum v. Van Calsem 935 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Discussion: The Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard of review for legal errors, in Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, (La.5/20/03), , rehearing denied, 9/5/03, and opined that “[wjhere one or more trial court legal errors interdict the fact-finding process, the manifest error standard is no longer applicable, and, if the record is otherwise complete, the appellate court should make its own independent de novo review of the record and determin
  • Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 6 (La.5/20/03), .
  • In the Interest of D.M. 928 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Bellanger, 2002-1443, p. 15 (La.5/20/03), .
  • In Re DM 928 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Bellanger, XXXX-XXXX, p. 15 (La.5/20/03), .
  • Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443 (La.05/20/03), .
  • Nelson v. City of Shreveport 921 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443 (La.05/20/03), .
  • Franklin v. Franklin 928 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 15 (La.5/20/03), ; (La.App.
  • Doe v. Breedlove 906 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 11 (La.5/20/03), .
  • Paul M. Arceneaux v. Roy De La Rosa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Arceneaux v. Rosa 889 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Bellanger, 02-1443, p. 13 (La.5/20/03), .
  • Freeman v. Teague 862 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    However, in Landry v. Bellanger, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/20/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the "Aggressor Doctrine" no longer has a place in Louisiana tort law.
  • Inzinna v. Walcott 868 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Since the trial court decision was issued prior to the rendition of the supreme court's opinion in Landry v. Bellanger, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/20/03), , it was without benefit of the supreme court's rejection of the aggressor doctrine, as being inconsistent with Louisiana's pure comparative fault regime.
  • Clark v. State Dept. of Pub. Saf. and Corr. 861 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In defense of his argument plaintiff cites Landry v. Bellanger, 02-C-1443 (La.5/20/03), .