Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Bd. of Ethics v. Ourso, 842 So. 2d 346.

21 citing documents.

  • L.J.D. v. M.V.S. 212 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Doe v. Louisiana Board of Ethics 112 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Barber v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau 97 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978 (La.4/9/03), ; see LSA-C.C.
  • Oxy USA Inc. v. Quintana Production Co. 79 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 2002-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , quoting Reeder v. North, 1997-0239, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), ."
  • Jackson v. JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT 993 So. 2d 219 La. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Hebert v. Doctors Mem.
  • Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
    In fact, as recently as 2003, this court reaffirmed Hebert in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , citing Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12, (La.10/21/97), .
  • Jackson v. JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT 981 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , and Reeder v. North, 97-0239, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Stanford v. ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE FUND 975 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03)
  • Dendy v. City Nat. Bank 977 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Ourso 964 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Naquin v. LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH GOVERNMENT 950 So. 2d 657 La. 2007
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , and Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Matherne v. Broussard 959 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , as follows: Peremption differs from prescription in several respects.
  • Ascension School Emp. Credit Union v. Psha 916 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    art. 3461; State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Randazzo v. LA. STATE UNIV. HEALTH SCIENC. 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 02-2675, p. 1, n. 1 (La.7/02/03), , n. 1 and Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), , citing Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hospital, 486 So.2d at 724 , reaff'd in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, pp. 6-7 (La.4/9/03), -351 .
  • Randazzo v. State, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 02-2675, p. 1, n. 1 (La.7/02/03), , n. 1 and Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), , citing Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hospital, 486 So.2d at 724 , reaff'd in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, pp. 6-7 (La.4/9/03), -351 .
  • Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 865 So. 2d 49 La. 2004
    of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Hebert v. Doctors Mem.
  • Pena v. Williams 867 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    The Supreme Court recently reiterated the difference between preemption and prescription in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03) , where the Supreme Court stated: Peremption differs from prescription in several respects.
  • David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 849 So. 2d 38 La. 2003
    reaff'd in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Conerly v. State 858 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    of Ethics v. Ourso, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), , quoting Reeder v. North, 97-0239, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), .