Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Adair, 846 So. 2d 687.

26 citing documents.

John Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC and Scott Newton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
4/ 9/ 03), ( a workers' compensation matter wherein the supreme court opined that "the tort immunity provided by the Act operates as an affirmative defense" and Welch v. United Med.
Damon J. Nelson v. Texaco, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
4/9/03), See Hernandez v. Aethon Energy Operating, LLC, 54,623, p. 17 (La.App.
Monica Sebble On Behalf Of The Estate Of Vivian Lee Brown (d) v. St. Luke's #2, Llc D/b/a … La. 2023
4/9/03), (a workers’ compensation matter wherein this Court opined that “the tort immunity provided by the Act operates as an affirmative defense[.]”; In re Welch v. United Med.
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government v. Lucile B. Randol Heirs, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Edward "Eddy" Jackson Versus Jefferson Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
4/9/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the tort immunity provided by the LWCA “operates as an affirmative defense; it is not a law evaluating conditions of legality of defendant’s conduct but, rather, serves as a vehicle for asserting a substantive defense that defeats an otherwise viable claim.” See also T
Boone Services, LLC v. Ascension Parish Government, Bridging the Gap Solution, LLC and Clint Cointment La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Seth H. Schaumburg Versus Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Rory T. White and Romaine L. White Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Richard White v. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
4/9/03), ) (the tort immunity created by workers’ compensation law is an affirmative defense because it “serves as a vehicle for asserting a substantive defense that defeats an otherwise viable claim”).
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
4/9/03), ; Comet Drilling Co. v. Tri-State Oil Tool Indus.
Bay v. Jefferson Parish Public Schools 218 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/9/03), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Board 219 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Augusta v. Audubon Zoo 176 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Sylvester Harris v. Olivier's Contractors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Brown v. Adair, 02–2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Harris v. Olivier's Contractors 155 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Kenneth James Mouton v. Hebert's Superette, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Mouton v. Hebert's Superette, Inc. 53 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
ally, the Louisiana Supreme Court and this court have both explicitly stated that the tort immunity created by workers’ compensation law is an affirmative defense because “it is not a law evaluating conditions of legality of defendant’s conduct but, rather, serves as a vehicle for asserting a substantive defense that defeats an otherwise leviable claim.” Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; see also Walls v. Am.
Glenn M. Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Voc. Rehab. Counselors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4/9/03), which held the immunity provisions of the workers’ compensation act did not bar suit for malpractice against a vocational rehabilitation counselor.
Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors 974 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Brown v. Adair, 02-2028 (La.4/9/03), , which held the immunity provisions of the workers' compensation act did not bar suit for malpractice against a vocational rehabilitation counselor.
Hebert v. LIC. PROFESS. VOC. REHAB. COUNS. 974 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
See Brown v. Adair, 02-2028 (La.4/9/03), , which held the immunity provisions of the workers' compensation act did not bar suit for malpractice against a vocational rehabilitation counselor, [4] This provision is modeled on the Code of Ethics for the National Association for Rehabilitation Professionals in the Private Sector, Section B8, which provides, in r
Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITED 894 So. 2d 1096 La. 2005
Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
William N. Keller v. Cleadieus McLeod La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Keller v. McLeod 866 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
” Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), .
Opel P. Teasley v. Charles K. Ates La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Teasley v. Ates 861 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
“[T]ort immunity provided by the Act operates as an affirmative defense; it is not a law evaluating conditions of legality of defendant’s conduct but, rather, serves as a vehicle for asserting a substantive defense that defeats an otherwise viable claim.” Brown v. Adair, 02-2028, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), .
Scarlet C. Adams v. Temple Inland - Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Adams v. TEMPLE INLAND, LA 858 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See generally Brown v. Adair, 02-2028 (La.4/9/03), .