DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Palmer v. BESE, 842 So. 2d 363.

14 citing documents.

  • Edward A. Songy Jr., Chief Administrator of The Sales and Use Tax Department of the Iberville Parish Council … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • Barton v. Jefferson Parish School Board 171 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    & Secondary Educ., 02-2043 (La.04/09/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court opined that the term of a contract could not be used to circumvent the notice requirement due a probationary special school teacher if termination, or non-renewal of a contract, occurred within the three-year probationary period.
  • Hays v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary & Secondary Education 39 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    of Elementary & Secondary Educ, 02-2043, p. 8 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Davis v. Picard 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    of Elementary and Secondary Educ., 02-2043, p. 8 (La, 4/9/03), .
  • Rabalais v. Nash 952 So. 2d 653 La. 2007
    Palmer v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 02-2043, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; Hollingsworth v. City of Minden, 01-2658 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Slaughter 917 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    of Elementary and Secondary Educ., 02-2043, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Cao v. Stalder 915 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    of Elementary & Secondary Educ., 02-2043 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Ferrell Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/9/03), -68: Principles of judicial interpretation of statutes are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the legislature in enacting the statute.
  • Lee v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd. 887 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    of Elementary and Secondary Educ., 02-2043 (La.4/9/03), .
  • Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4/9/03), -68: Principles of judicial interpretation of statutes are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the legislature in enacting the statute.
  • Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The rules pertaining to statutory interpretation were recently laid out by the supreme court in Palmer v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 02-2043, pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), , 367-68: Principles of judicial interpretation of statutes are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the legislature in enacting the statute.
  • Sidney Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    4/9/03), -68: Principles of judicial interpretation of statutes are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the legislature in enacting the statute.
  • Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners 858 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    According to the general rules of statutory construction as reviewed for us by our supreme court in Palmer v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 02-2043, pp. 4-6 (La.4/9/03), , 367-68: Principles of judicial interpretation of statutes are designed to ascertain and enforce the intent of the legislature in enacting the statute.
  • Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 959 La. 2003
    Palmer v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 02-2043, p. 5 (La.4/9/03), ; Hollingsworth v. City of Minden, 01-2658 (La.6/21/02), .