DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 852 So. 2d 983.

20 citing documents.

  • Lee Eric Bess v. Graphic Packaging International, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • Johnson v. Manitowoc Co. 256 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • Allensworth v. Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc. 178 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Fite v. Louisima Title Co., 02-2607 (La.6/27/03), .
  • Phillips v. City of New Orleans 116 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607, p. 3 (La.6/27/03), .
  • Richards v. St. Bernard Parish Government 91 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    This standard applies even in those workers’ compensation cases where, as here, “the evidence before the trier of fact consists solely of written reports, records, and depositions.” Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607, p. 3 (La.6/27/03), .
  • Clara Evans v. Hampton Inn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Evans v. Hampton Inn 6 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (citing Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.06/27/03), ).
  • Adams v. Sysco Food Service of New Orleans 990 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 2002-2607, p. 3 (La.6/27/03), .
  • Jackson v. Red River Parish School Bd. 954 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 2002-2607 (La.06/27/03), .
  • Chassion v. Cingular Wireless 943 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    NOTES [1] In Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.6/27/03), , the supreme court concluded that medical reports may serve as the required expert testimony for proof of disputed medical matters.
  • Brenda Chaisson v. Cingular Wireless La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    6/27/03), the supreme court concluded that medical reports may serve as the required expert testimony for proof of disputed medical matters.
  • Taylor v. Hollywood Casino 935 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    *296 In Fite v. Louisiana Title Company, 02-2607 (La.06/27/03), , the supreme court concluded that medical reports may serve as the required expert testimony for proof of disputed medical matters.
  • Thompson v. City of New Orleans 933 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    In Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.6/27/03), , the Supreme Court also stated that "[i]t is well settled in Louisiana jurisprudence that the manifest error standard of appellate review applies in compensation actions even when the evidence before the trier of fact consists solely of written reports, records, and depositions."
  • Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors 926 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    (citing Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.06/27/03), ).
  • Linda F. Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    (citing Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.06/27/03), ).
  • Peters v. General Motors Corp. 892 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 02-2607 (La.06/27/03), , on remand, 36,393 (La.App.2d Cir.10/24/03), , writ denied, 03-3230 (La.02/20/04), ; Johnson v. Johnson Controls, 38,495 (La.App.2d Cir.05/12/04), .
  • Thomas v. Alliance Compressors 889 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Fite v. Louisiana Title Company, 02-2607, p. 2 (La.6/27/03), , noted that live expert testimony is not required to support a finding of an occupational disease, and that "[e]xpert testimony may be admitted by ...
  • Johnson v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 873 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    File v. Louisiana Title Company, 2002-2607 (La.06/27/03), .
  • Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 868 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 2002-2607 (La.6/27/03), .
  • Fite v. Louisiana Title Co. 859 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Fite v. Louisiana Title Co., 2002-2607 (La.06/27/03), ("Fite II").