Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n, 851 So. 2d 1006.
-
St. James Parish Versus Matthew James Roussel
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
6/27/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: 24-CA-382 7 Implied dedication is a common law doctrine, but it has been recognized by Louisiana courts since the nineteenth century.
- John Preston v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Pac Housing Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Timothy H. Mullenix v. George R. Mullenix La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
-
Edward J. Rachal v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
6/27/03), (footnote omitted): Implied dedication is a common law doctrine, but it has been recognized by Louisiana courts since the nineteenth century.
- Philip Adam Thomas v. Kelly Jean Willis Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-
State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land & Exploration, Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
6/27/03), the supreme court stated: Our legislature has never enacted a comprehensive scheme governing dedication to public use.
- Ralph Joe Dalton v. Alan Graham La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
- Entrada Company, L.L.C. v. Tony Cassels, Connie L. Cassels, Marc Shannon Conerly and Rickie Conerly La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
-
First Bank & Trust v. Treme
262 So. 3d 1050
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/27/03), , 1023 ; Rosell v. ESCO , , 844 (La.
- Ammar Invs., LLC v. Certain Underwriters Lloyd's 261 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Templeton v. Jarreau 259 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
River Rental Realty LLC v. Deep S. Leasing, LLC
250 So. 3d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/27/03), , the court explained: When a private person owns the land on which a public road is built and the public merely has the right to use it, the land is a private thing subject to public use.
- Lafayette General Medical Center,inc. v. Richard Hill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Michael Albarado, Individually v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Albarado v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 247 So. 3d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
William Terry Ebarb and Dewanna N. Ebarb v. Unopened Succ. of Alfair Jones Sepulvado
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
-
Norman Michael Sepulvado v. William Terry Ebarb
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
- Ebarb v. Unopened Succession Sepulvado 241 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Marguerite Fugler Cardwell v. Oaks Care Center, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass' n, 02–2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
- Cardwell v. Oaks Care Ctr., LLC 258 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Donald P. Lemoine v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Jake Chimento v. Kdm Electric of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- John Kennedy v. Christopher Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Chimento v. KDM Electric of Alexandria 229 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Kennedy v. Davis 229 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Carter v. City of Shreveport
244 So. 3d 659
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
06/27/03), , citing Rosell v. ESCO , (La.
- Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 221 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Ditta 223 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Vernon A. Valentino, M.D. v. Heart and Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Valentino v. Heart & Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. 221 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Thomas J. Bell, Sr. v. the City of Lake Charles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’ n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
- Bell v. City of Lake Charles 218 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Melvin R. Lucas, Jr., Et Ux. v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Lucas v. Rapides Health Care System, L.L.C. 216 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Meagan Lemoine v. Lionel Augustine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. 204 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Trans Pacific Interactive, Inc. v. U.S. Telemetry Corp. 203 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Frazier v. Shady
200 So. 3d 874
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 2002-2660 (La.06/27/03), , Hopkins v. Nola, 46,114 (La.App.2d Cir.03/09/11), .
-
State v. Chisholm
191 So. 3d 1161
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03), .
-
Jeffrey L. Buelow v. Donald Melvin Roberts
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’ n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
-
Adrienne Stermer v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’ n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
- Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. Kerr-Mcgee Rocky Mountain, LLC 193 So. 3d 1110 La. 2015
-
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. City of Shreveport
132 So. 3d 537
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
This case was overturned as to the requirements of a tacit dedication by Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n, 2002-2660 (La.6/27/03), .
-
James v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
122 So. 3d 1188
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660, p. 9 (La.6/27/03)
-
Benjamin v. Zeichner
113 So. 3d 197
La. 2013
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660 (La.6/27/03), .
-
Webb v. Franks Investment Co.
105 So. 3d 764
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660 (La.06/27/03), , which overturned St.
-
Hopkins v. Nola
58 So. 3d 1075
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 02-2660 (La.6/27/03), .
-
Quality Flooring v. B.F. Construction Co.
56 So. 3d 395
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 2008-1163, p. 29 (La.5/22/09), (citing Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass’n, 2002-2660 (La.6/27/03), ), the Supreme Court explained: [t]he standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a district court’s finding of fact unless that finding is clearly wrong in light of the record reviewed in its entirety.
- Tom Clement v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010