Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. American Home Products Corp., 844 So. 2d 242.

23 citing documents.

Michael Miazza, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 4th Cir. 3/26/03), -258, writ denied, 03-1180 (La.
Joseph Robert, Gloria Decuir-Robert, Albert Bierria, Gwendolyn Bierria v. State of Louisiana, Through the Governor, the Division of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 3/26/03), (citation omitted).
Dennis Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. National Healthcare of Leesville,inc. D/B/A Byrd … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 3/26/03), writ denied, 03–1180 (La.6/27/03)
Duhon v. Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n 197 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Claborne v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 165 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/26/03), (citing Adams v. CSX Railroads, 92-1077 (La.App.
Doe v. University Healthcare Systems, L.L.C. 145 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Doe v. Southern Gyms, LLC 112 So. 3d 822 La. 2013
4 Cir. 3/26/03); , writ denied, 2003-1180 (La.6/27/03); ; Singleton v. Northfield Ins.
Barbara Houssiere v. Asco USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/26/03), (bifurcation refers to separately phased trials).
Houssiere v. ASCO USA 108 So. 3d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 3/26/03) , (bifurcation refers to separately phased trials).
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/26/03), (Citation omitted).
Pollard v. Alpha Technical 102 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/26/08), , 249 writ denied, 2003-1180 (La.6/27/03), , this Court wrote: The purpose and intent of a class action procedure is to adjudicate and obtain res judicata effect on all common issues applicable not only to the class representatives who bring the action, but to all other others who are similarly situated
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 36 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Pollard v. Alpha Technical 31 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lejeune v. Gioe 21 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Thomas v. Mobil Oil Corp. 14 So. 3d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 3/26/03), -258 , for the propositions that “a class action may be certified only if numer-osity, typicality, adequacy of representation and commonality requirements are met; the burden of proving the existence of these three elements falls on the plaintiffs; and that the class is definable.
Chalona v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 3 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Chalona v. LOUISIANA CIT. PROP. INS. CORP. 3 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Galjour v. BANK ONE EQUITY INVESTORS-BIDCO 935 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 3/26/03), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/27/03), .
Watters v. Department of Social Services 929 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 3/26/03), , citing Eastin v. Entergy Corp., 97-1094 (La.App.
Howard v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 924 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 3/26/03), , writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.6/27/03), .
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 3/26/04), ; Doe v. Archdiocese of New Orleans, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.App.
Daniels v. Witco Corp. 877 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
4th Cir.3/26/03), , writs denied, 03-1180 (La.6/27/03), ; Atkins v. Harcross Chemicals, Inc., 93-1904 (La.App.
Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., LLC 864 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004