Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faulkner v. McCarty Corp., 853 So. 2d 24.

18 citing documents.

Daniel Harris v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., LLC and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/03), (quoting Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 98-2081, p. 22 (La.
Marty Melerine and Oyster Fisheries, Inc. v. Tom's Marine & Salvage, LLC, Tom's Welding, Inc., Triple T Marine, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/03), ).
Romano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 221 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 6/11/03), , this Court upheld a $2,300,000.00 verdict in a case involving death from mesothelioma.
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bridgewater v. New Orleans Regional Transit Authority 190 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC 167 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Scharfenstein v. Avena Shipping of Cyprus 131 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 6/11/03), (duty is a question of law that is subject to de novo review on appeal).
Falcone v. Touro Infirmary 129 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 6/11/03), (citing McGuire v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass’n, 02-1401, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), ).
Passaro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 4 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Morella v. Board of Commissioners 988 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/11/03) , (La.App.
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 947 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Palermo v. Port of New Orleans 951 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Palermo v. Port of New Orleans 933 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Bell v. Dunn 924 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 6/11/03) , , 27 that: "[I]ssues not brought before the trial court cannot be considered for the first time on appeal"; based on analysis set forth in the ensuing paragraphs, we need not reach the question of how broadly the statement in Wilson was intended to be applied [10] .
Scheurmann v. Foti 894 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 6/11/03) , for the proposition that the sheriff and deputy Magee are liable under the theory of custodial liability because they had custody, care or garde of the open room in which the assault occurred.
Treen Const. Co., Inc. v. Schott 866 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Jefferson v. Cooper/T. Smith Corp. 858 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 6/11/03), , *697 reh.