Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ring v. STATE, DOTD, 835 So. 2d 423.

41 citing documents.

Sarah Allen Davidson v. Terrance Hardy La. 2026
1/14/03), n.3; Cooper v. Lykes, 218 La.
In Re: Clemmie Leon Porter Applying for the Adoption of L.R.C. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. William Wayne Lee, Jr. La. 2023
T. S v. Congregation Of Holy Cross Southern Province La. 2023
& Development, 02-1367, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
Calcasieu Parish School Board Sales & Use Department, Et Al. v. Nelson Industrial Steam Company La. 2021
Charles Branton v. Parish Of St. Tammany And St. Tammany Parish Council La. 2021
1/14/03), -28; Matherne, 661 So.2d at 436.
Larry Bize, Sr. and Michelle R. Bize v. Malcolm Larvadain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Bize v. Larvadain 263 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ivan I. Smith, Jr. and Gloria G. Smith v. Kimberly L. Robinson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, … 265 So. 3d 740 La. 2018
Succession of Scheuermann ex rel. Gonzalez v. Scheuermann & Jones LLC ex rel. Jones 171 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
and Development, the Supreme Court noted that it has “repeatedly and consistently held that courts should refrain from reaching or determining the constitutionality of legislation unless, in the context of a particular case, the resolution of the constitutional issue is essential to the decision of the case or controversy.” 02-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), .
Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 118 So. 3d 1033 La. 2013
See Ring v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), (“We have repeatedly and consistently held that courts should refrain from reaching or determining the constitutionality of legislation unless, in the context of a particular case, the resolution of the constitutional issue is essential to the decision of the case or controversy.”).
State v. Duheart 125 So. 3d 1054 La. 2012
See also Ring v. State, DOTD, 02-1367, p. 5 (La.1/14/03), (noting that the role of a judge in our system of 'justice is such that “a judge should not judicially declare a statute unconstitutional unless it is essential to the decision of a case or controversy”).
Universal Placement International, Inc. v. Louisiana Workforce Commission 97 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
& Development, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), -28 .
Johnson v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC 95 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
& Dev., 2002-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Fleming, 2001-2799, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
State v. Rochon 75 So. 3d 876 La. 2011
Russo v. Kraus 49 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Ring v. State, 02-1367, p. 4-5 (La.1/14/03), -427 .
Tietjen v. City of Shreveport 36 So. 3d 192 La. 2010
Ring v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Fleming, 01-2799, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
State v. Bertrand 6 So. 3d 738 La. 2009
State v. Matron, 07-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), ; State v. Mercadel, 03-3015, p. 7 (La.5/25/04), ; Ring v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), .
Mitch David Bourque v. Tomas Drake La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The following is well settled: [The court] is required to decide a constitutional issue only “if the procedural posture of the case and the relief sought by the appellant demand that [it] do so.” Ring v. State, DOTD, 2002-1367, pp. 6-7
Bourque v. Drake 995 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ring v. State, DOTD, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 6-7 [(La.1/14/03)], .
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
& Development, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Hatton 985 So. 2d 709 La. 2008
State v. Mercadel, 03-3015, p. 7 (La.5/25/04), (citing Ring v. State, DOTD, 02-1367, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), ).
Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government 982 So. 2d 795 La. 2008
& Development, 02-1367, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Lanclos 980 So. 2d 643 La. 2008
and Development, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/14/03), , this Court stated: We have repeatedly and consistently held that courts should refrain from reaching or determining the constitutionality of legislation unless, in the context of a particular case, the resolution of the constitutional issue is essential to the decision of the case or controversy.
Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc. 956 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
Ring v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; Cat's Meow, Inc., 98-0601 at 16-17, 720 So.2d at 1199 ; Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. New Orleans Aviation Board, 97-0752, p. 4 (La.10/31/97), .
Ring v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 955 So. 2d 671 La. 2007
See Ring v. State, DOTD, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
State v. Mercadel, 03-3015, p. 8 (La.5/25/04), ; Ring v. State DOTD, 02-1367, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), .
In Re Melancon 935 So. 2d 661 La. 2006
State v. Mercadel, 03-3015, pp. 7-8 (La.5/25/04), , citing Ring v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), .
Hitchcock v. State 901 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Ring v. State Department of Transportation and Development, 02-1367, pp. 4-7 (La.1/14/03), -28 , the supreme court ruled that plaintiff's motion seeking a declaration that a statute was unconstitutional was premature for lack of standing, stating: We have repeatedly and consistently held that courts should refrain from reaching or determining the constitutionality of legislation unless, in the context o
Connie Hitchcock v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1/14/03), -28, the supreme court ruled that plaintiff’s motion seeking a declaration that a statute was unconstitutional was premature for lack of standing, stating: We have repeatedly and consistently held that courts should refrain from reaching or determining the constitutionality of legislation
State v. Citizen 898 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
& Development, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), ).
DENHAM SPRINGS v. All Taxpayers 894 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
Ring v. State, DOTD, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/14/03), ("Courts should avoid constitutional rulings when the case can be disposed of on non-constitutional grounds.").
Louisiana Municipal Association v. State 893 So. 2d 809 La. 2005
Ring v. State, DOTD, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ("Courts should avoid constitutional rulings when the case can be disposed of on non-constitutional grounds.").
Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission v. Olivier 892 So. 2d 570 La. 2005
_J^This is so because this court may only consider a constitutional issue where “ ‘the procedural posture of the case and the relief sought by the appellant demand that [it] do so.’ ” State v. Mercadel, 2003-3015 (La.5/25/04), (quoting Ring v. State, DOTD, 2002-1367 (La.1/14/03), ).
GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXP. COM'N v. Olivier 892 So. 2d 570 La. 2005
This is so because this court may only consider a constitutional issue where "`the procedural posture of the case and the relief sought by the appellant demand that [it] do so.'" State v. Mercadel, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/25/04), (quoting Ring v. State, DOTD, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/14/03), ).
State ex rel. Williams v. State 888 So. 2d 792 La. 2004
and Dev., 02-1367, p. 5 (La.1/14/03), ; Blanchard v. State through Parks and Recreation Comm’n, 96-0053, p. 3 (La.5/21/96), .
State v. Brown 879 So. 2d 1276 La. 2004
and Dev., 02-1367, p. 4 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Fleming, 01-2799, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
State v. Mercadel 874 So. 2d 829 La. 2004
Ring v. State, DOTD, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 6-7, .
Ring v. State 871 So. 2d 1108 La. 2004
and Development, 02-1367 (La.1/14/03), {“Ring I”), we vacated as premature the judgment of the district court which declared La.
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Foundation 865 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
and Dev., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.1/14/03), .
Davis v. Farm Fresh Food Supplier 844 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Ring v. State, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 n. 5 (La.1/14/03), , 429 n. 5.