DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dumas v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CULT., REC., 828 So. 2d 530.

77 citing documents.

  • DERRY LABORDE VERSUS KIRBY M. PECOT Consolidated With KENYAWN AUGUSTINE VERSUS NEW HORIZON KIDS QUEST, IV, INC. Consolidated … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Laborde v. Pecot 942 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Laborde v. Pecot 942 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Laborde v. Pecot 925 So. 2d 522 La. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Laborde v. Pecot 925 So. 2d 523 La. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Laborde v. Pecot 925 So. 2d 522 La. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Laborde v. Pecot 925 So. 2d 523 La. 2006
    2323 and 2324, as interpreted in Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 925 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , Entergy was entitled to present evidence of the negligence and fault of third parties at the trial of this matter.
  • Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
    Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Explained Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
    As we explained in Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , 537: "The comparative fault article, La.
  • Gatlin v. Entergy Corp. 904 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, in upholding the right of the State of Louisiana to present, as an affirmative defense, evidence relating to the fault of a third party, held that Louisiana Civil Code Article 2323 "clearly requires that the fault of every person responsible for a plaintiff's injuries be compared, whethe
  • Touro Infirmary v. Sizeler Architects 900 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Dept. of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism, XXXX-XXXX, p. 14 (La.10/15/2002), , 538 the Supreme Court stated: With these 1996 Amendments to Article 2323 and 2324(B) ...
  • Ginger McIntosh, Indiv. v. Wayne F. McElveen, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • McIntosh v. McElveen 893 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, 02-563, p. 3 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Gibbs v. Magnolia Living Center, Inc. 870 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Dept. of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), , Magnolia argues that the fault of all persons (joint tortfeasors) allegedly contributing to an injury must be quantified and the joint tortfeasors joined in the same suit.
  • Explained LeRay v. Bartholomew 871 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    As we explained in Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , 537: "The comparative fault article, La.
  • Hernandez v. Chalmette Medical Center 869 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 3/13/02) , , writ denied, 2002-2029 (La.5/24/02), , and the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dumas v. State Dept. of Culture, Recreation and Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , are authority for the application of two caps in the instant case.
  • Johnson v. City of Winnfield 862 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Dumas v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis 857 So. 2d 407 La. 2003
    Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • Explained Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
    [3] As we explained in Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism , XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , 537: "The comparative fault article, La.
  • Landry v. Bellanger 851 So. 2d 943 La. 2003
    [3] Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Held v. Aubert 845 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • Ginn v. Woman's Hospital Foundation, Inc. 842 So. 2d 338 La. 2003
    Dumas v. State, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Williams v. City of Marksville 839 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Dep't of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, 02-563, p. 11 (La.10/15/02); .
  • Oubre v. Eslaih 840 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The language of article 2324 at that time “balanced the risks of insolvent, incapable of paying, unknown, and absent tortfeasors among plaintiffs and the known, solvent defendants.” Dumas v. State of Louisiana, 2002-0563 (La.10/15/02), , citing, Touchard v. Williams, supra.
  • Distinguished Perniciaro v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 841 So. 2d 723 La. 2003
  • Ashmore v. Hilton 834 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, 02-563 (La.10/15/02), .