Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 839 So. 2d 5.

38 citing documents.

Thomas Southern v. Servpro D E Investments and LWCC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Alma Moore v. Kellie's Sitting Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Marvin Ray Scott v. Packaging Corporation of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Blann Kyle v. Boise Cascade Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Kyle v. Boise Cascade Co. 249 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Scott v. Packaging Corp. of Am. 251 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Lafayette Bone & Joint Clinic (Charles Morris) v. Louisiana United Business Sif 194 So. 3d 1112 La. 2016
1/28/03), wherein this court, with reference to LSA-R.S.
Mildred Deloach v. Fara Insurance Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Deloach v. Fara Insurance Services 154 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 02-1071 (La.01/28/03), .
Massey v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding 152 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 2002-1071 (La.1/28/03), ; Thompson, supra.
Baker v. Phillips Van Heusen Corp. 91 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 2002-1071 (La.01/28/03), .
Fru-Con Construction Corporation v. Clarence Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Fru-Con Construction Corporation v. Xchanging and Oscar Kierum II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Moore 81 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
23:1121(B) and Smith v. S. Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. Xchanging 81 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
23:1121(B) and Smith v. S. Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Robert Carmouche v. Kraft Foods La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Carmouche v. Kraft Foods, Inc. 62 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/95) , , reversed on other grounds, Smith v. Southern Holdings, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Taylor v. Plastech Engineered Products, Inc. 56 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
23:1121 B(l); Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 2002-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Tida Rose Bourgeois v. Brown's Market & Deli, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Reed v. St. Francis Medical Center 8 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 2002-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Robin Williams v. Dr. Robert Morrow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Williams v. Morrow 7 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Rushing v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 965 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071, p. 9 (La.1/28/03), .
Guillory v. Bofinger's Tree Service 950 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.1/28/03), .
Battle v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp. 935 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), .
Shelby Smith v. Morris & Dickson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/28/03), settled a split among the appellate courts concerning an employee’s choice of physician when he submits to an employer-referred physician for treatment.
Smith v. Morris & Dickson 924 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
23:1121, the supreme court in Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), , settled a split among the appellate courts concerning an employee's choice of physician when he submits to an employer-referred physician for treatment.
RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblum 894 So. 2d 1113 La. 2005
v. Fruge, 03-0115, p. 4 (La.10/21/03), ; Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), .
Player v. International Paper Co. 892 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), .
Thompson v. the Animal Hosp. 889 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Smith v. Southern Holding Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), .
Ricky Gibson v. Shaw Global Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1/28/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.R.S.
Gibson v. Shaw Global Energy Services 885 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Moreover, in Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.R.S.
LANE MEMORIAL HOSP v. Gay 873 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the statutory provisions of LSA-R.S.
Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp. 860 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), , section 1002 of the drug-testing statute, entitled "Applicability," sets forth the broad scope of the drug-testing statute, stating that it "applies to testing for the presence of marijuana, opioids, cocaine, amphetamines, and phencyclidine."
Daniels v. Keller Supply, Inc. 854 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 1 (La.1/28/03), .
Chauvin v. SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES 858 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Most recently, in Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/28/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved the disparate appellate interpretations of La.
Belaire v. Don Shetler Olds Buick Chevrolet 847 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
We find no manifest error in that determination, especially in light of the recent supreme court case of Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., 02-1071 (La.1/28/03), .
Authement v. Shappert Engineering 840 So. 2d 1181 La. 2003
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc., , (La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by