Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perritt v. Dona, 849 So. 2d 56.

45 citing documents.

Arnold Wayne Lee and Paula White Lee v. Green Clinic La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Paula Patterson, Jon Crumpler and Carey Crumpler. Individually and On Behalf of Their Mother, Anita Carey v. Claiborne … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
7/2/03), Self v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 55,130 (La.
Monica Sebble On Behalf Of The Estate Of Vivian Lee Brown (d) v. St. Luke's #2, Llc D/b/a … La. 2023
7/2/03), (wherein this Court distinguished between “a ‘claim’ pending before the medical review panel for review” and a “petition” filed in a civil case).
Monica Sebble on Behalf of the Estate of Vivian Lee Brown (D) v. St. Luke's 2, LLC D/B/A … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
7/2/03) (emphasis in original).15 Based on the reasons set forth below, we find gross negligence and willful misconduct to be legal standards reserved for a determination by the trier of fact.
Nickie Lejeune v. Kayla Fontenot, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Alex Lane (D) v. Nexion Health at Minden, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Rhoda Timpton v. Touro Infirmary and Dr. Richard L. Meyer … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Christopher A. Bailey (D) v. Dr. Michael Loewe La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Medical Review Panel Kevin Jordan (D) v. Community Care Hospital, J. Robert Barnes, M.D. and Anwar Ismail, M.D. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
7/2/03), (internal quotations and citations omitted); see also Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., LOUISIANA TORT LAW, §21-3(f) (1996) (observing that “[a] party may file a petition in district court for assignment of a case number to facilitate discovery in the proceedings before the panel”).
In re Med. Review Panel for Brock 274 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Jeansonne v. Bonano 241 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/2/03), , 67 [ (Weimer, J., concurring) ].
Darrin Coulon and Tess Coulon v. Endurance Risk Partners, Inc., West Bank Surgery Center, L.L.C., and Mark Juneau, … 221 So. 3d 809 La. 2017
7/2/03), explained that the medical review panel claim is not a fact pleading which requires the same specificity as a petition in a lawsuit.
Truxillo v. Thomas 200 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See also Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 13 (La.7/2/03), (“the MMA does not specifically delineate that the parties are entitled to ‘notice.’ The claim is not required to be a fact pleading with the specificity that may be required of a | (¡petition in a lawsuit; rather, the claim need only present Sufficient information for the panel to make a determination as to wheth
Daniel v. Minnard 196 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601 (La.7/2/03)
In the Matter of the Professional Liability Claim of Brian Snavely (D) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In re the Professional Liability Claim of Snavely 178 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
40:1299.47(A)(1); Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601 (La.7/2/03) .
Parks v. Louisiana Guest House, Inc. 155 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 13 (La.7/2/03), ; Ward v. Vivian Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, 47,649, p. 11 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/13), .
Chet David Jeansonne v. Cory Paul Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Jeansonne v. Roy 156 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The exception of no cause of action “tests the legal sufficiency of pleadings detailed in the petition.” Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, 02-2603, p. 16 (La.7/2/03), .
Ward v. Vivian Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center 116 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601 (La.7/2/03), .
The Estate of Willie Walters v. West Louisiana Health Services, Inc., Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Estate of Walters v. West Louisiana Health Services, Inc. 157 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, a plaintiff in a malpractice Inaction is not required at the medical review panel to “specify the health care providers’ standards of care.” Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, 02-2603, p. 13 (La.7/2/03), .
Woods v. Cousins 102 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
9:5628 in a court of competent jurisdiction and proper venue at any time without need for completion of the review process by the medical review panel.” See, Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601 (La.7/2/03), (a health care provider may raise an exception of prescription during the medical review panel stage of a medical malpractice proceeding).
Rita Patin v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Patin v. State 74 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, 02-2603 (La.7/2/03), .
Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
Most notably, this Court's reliance on, discussion of, or citing to Hebert or its three-year prescriptive period analysis has either been in obiter dicta in cases where the three-year provision did not come into play and the discussion of which was not necessary to the resolution of the issues, *213 Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), (medical malpractice case involving the propounding of interrogatories and exceptions of vagueness or no cause of action); Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 8
Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
[7] *895 The difference between a request for review to initiate a panel proceeding and a petition to initiate a lawsuit was addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, 02-2603 (La.7/2/03), .
Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
See Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601 (La.7/2/03), .
Holmes v. LSU/EA Conway Medical Center 997 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601 (La.7/2/03), .
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
92); Hillman v. Akins, 93-0631 (La.1/14/94), ; Whitnell v. Silverman, 95-0112, 95-0259 (La.12/6/96), ; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Campo v. Correa, 01-2702 (La.6/21/02), ; State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978 (La.4/9/03), ; Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, 02-2603 (La.7/2/03), ; Bailey v. *65 Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684 (La.1/20/05), ; Naquin v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, 06-2227 (La.2/22/07), .
Banks v. Parish of Jefferson 990 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
and Dev., XXXX-XXXX (La.2004), ; Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601 (La.2003), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX (La.1999), ; Ruiz v. Oniate, 1997-2412 (La.1998), ; Detillier v. Kenner Regional Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX (La.2004), .
In Re Med. Malprac. Claims Regard. Diecidue 972 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 9; Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), -66 .
Booker v. Byrd 968 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.9/20/02), , affirmed in part, reversed in part (on other grounds) 02-2601, 02-2603 (La.7/2/03), , we had occasion to address the "complaint" which the injured plaintiff must file with the PCF and the notice that must be given through that complaint to the defendant health care provider and the medical review panel for the malpractice claim.
Bardwell v. Faust 962 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In the case of Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 16 (La.7/2/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court interpreted La.
Allie Mae Bruce v. Rapides Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Primus v. Touro Infirmary 925 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), (citing La.
Williams v. NOTAMI HOSPITALS OF LOUISIANA 927 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
At the hearing on the dilatory exception, the trial court overruled the exception, relying on Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601, 2002-2603 (La.7/2/03), .
Gelè v. Binder 904 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 9/20/02), , aff'd in part, rev’d in pan, 2002-2601 (La.7/2/03), .
Detillier v. Kenner Regional Medical Center 877 So. 2d 100 La. 2004
and Dev., XXXX-XXXX p. 2 (La.2/25/04), ; Perritt v. Dona, 2002-2601 p. 13 (La.7/2/03), ; Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.11/19/99), ; Ruiz v. Oniate, 1997-2412, p. 4 (La.5/19/98), .
Randazzo v. LA. STATE UNIV. HEALTH SCIENC. 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 02-2675, p. 1, n. 1 (La.7/02/03), , n. 1 and Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), , citing Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hospital, 486 So.2d at 724 , reaff'd in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, pp. 6-7 (La.4/9/03), -351 .
Randazzo v. State, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 879 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 02-2675, p. 1, n. 1 (La.7/02/03), , n. 1 and Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), , citing Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hospital, 486 So.2d at 724 , reaff'd in State Board of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, pp. 6-7 (La.4/9/03), -351 .
Little v. Pou 853 So. 2d 616 La. 2003
Remand to the trial court for reconsideration in light of Perritt v. Dona, 02-CC-2061 c/w 02-CC-2603 (La.7/2/03), .
In re Medical Review Panel ex rel. Claim of Roy 853 So. 2d 648 La. 2003
See Perritt v. Dona, 02-2061 (La.7/2/03), .