DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Intern. River Ctr. v. Johns-Manville Sales, 861 So. 2d 139.

34 citing documents.

  • J. Caldarera & Company, Inc. Versus Triumph Construction Company, LLC. and Atain Specialty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • River House Partners, LLC v. Clark Construction Inc. of Mississippi, Rader's Insulation Express, LLC, M&R Builders, LLC of … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
    12/3/03), ); see also Florida Gas Transmission Co., LLC, 285 So.3d at 1099-1100; (citing Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 84, 123 S.Ct.
  • Rachel Kimball and Tanya Silvernagel v. Laura Kamenitz, Eliot Kamenitz, Nola Cat, LLC, A/K/A Nola Cat Properties, LLC, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    12/3/03), see also Saavedra v. Dealmaker Devs., LLC, 2008-1239, p. 7 (La.
  • Covenant General Contractors, Inc. v. S.J. Louis Construction of Texas Ltd. and City of Baton Rouge, East Baton … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    12/ 3/ 03), Arkel Constructors, Inc. v. Duplantier & Meric, Architects, L. L. C., 2006- 1950 ( La.
  • Livingston Parish Library System v. Brunt Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    12/ 3/ 03), Arkel Constructors, Inc. v. Duplantier & Meric, Architects, L. L. C., 2006- 1950 ( La.
  • Livingston Parish Library System v. Brunt Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    12/ 3/ 03), Arkel Constructors, Inc. v. Duplantier & Meric, Architects, L. L. C., 2006- 1950 ( La.
  • Nelson v. H20 Hair, Inc. 274 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    12/3/03), , 140-42, "Neither [arbitration] statute allows the trial court to determine waiver issues."
  • New Jax Condominiums Ass'n v. Vanderbilt New Orleans, LLC 219 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Swaggart v. Doe 216 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • Potier v. Morris Bart, L.L.C. 214 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    12/3/03), , acknowledged that the arbitration statute requires that a lower court shall order arbitration “once [the court] finds that there has been an agreement to arbitrate and a failure to comply therewith.” Put differently, the “threshold inquiry a court must decide is whether the parties agreed to arbitrate their dis
  • Delta Administrative Services, L.L.C. v. Limousine Livery, Ltd. 216 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 3 (La.12/3/03), ; (holding that “[o]nce the court finds an agreement to arbitrate and a failure to comply therewith, the court shall order arbitration”), The proper procedure for a party to raise the failure to submit to arbitration is
  • University of Louisiana Monroe Facilities, Inc. v. JPI Apartment Development, L.P. 151 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 2002-3060 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Morial v. BPI Home Builders, L.L.C. 106 So. 3d 545 La. 2013
    See International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Wilson v. Allums 94 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    In International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 2002-3060 (La.12/3/03), , the supreme court apparently closed the door to courts deciding, without consent of the parties, whether the right to arbitration has been waived.
  • Jasper Contractors, Inc. v. E-Claim.com, LLC 94 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See also International River Center v. Johns-Man-ville Sales Corporation, 2002-3060, pp. 3-4 (La.12/3/03), -42 (holding that LSA-R.S.
  • FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver 62 So. 3d 709 La. 2011
    4 Cir. 2/12/97) , ; accord, International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), (the two acts are “very similar.”) To the extent the two acts do conflict, any “inconsistency between the federal act and Louisiana law must be resolved in favor of the federal act as federal law preempts contrary state law.” Blount, 695 So.2d at 1003 (citing Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1, 16 , 104 S.Ct.
  • Regions Bank v. Weber 53 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , acknowledged that the arbitration statute requires that the lower court shall order arbitration “once [the court] finds that there has been an agreement to arbitrate and a failure to comply therewith” and the waiver is reserved for the arbitrator to decide.
  • Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. 6 So. 3d 179 La. 2009
    International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 3 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Bernard v. Hildebrand 993 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Nco Portfolio Management Inc. v. Gougisha 985 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Pursuant to the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.
  • Arkel Constructors v. Duplantier & Meric 965 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, 02-3060, p. 2 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Chad Easterling v. Royal Manufactured Housing, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    12/3/03), the Federal Arbitration Act is “a collection of statutes 5 which is very similar to the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law.” See also Dufrene v. HBOS Manufacturing, LP, 03-2201, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Easterling v. ROYAL MANUFACTURED HOUSING 963 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Pursuant to the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , the Federal Arbitration Act is "a collection of statutes which is very similar to the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law."
  • LaFleur v. Law Offices of Anthony G. Buzbee 960 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Application of the LBAL as opposed to the FAA is of little consequence because, as pointed out by the Louisiana Supreme Court in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), , the FAA is "a collection of statutes which is very similar" to the LBAL.
  • Touro Infirmary v. Sizeler Architects 947 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Additionally, this Court is directed by the Supreme Court's holding in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/3/03); .
  • Allen v. Valero Energy Corp. 951 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    NOTES [1] We note in both Aguillard and International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), , the Court discussed the issue of whether the court or arbitrator decides the waiver issue.
  • Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 908 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
    International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 3 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Buster Rico, Et Ux. v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/3/03), the Federal Arbitration Act is “a collection of statutes which is very similar to the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law.” See also Dufrene v. HBOS Manufacturing, LP, 03-2201, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Rico v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. 903 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    [2] As this court recognized in Abshire, 896 So.2d at 283 , n. 4: [A]pplication of the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law as opposed to the Federal Arbitration Act is of little consequence because, as pointed out by the supreme court in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , the Federal Arbitration Act is "a collection of statutes which is very similar to the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law."
  • Roland J. Abshire v. Belmont Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/3/03), the Federal Arbitration Act is “a collection of statutes which is very similar to the Louisiana Binding Arbitration Law.” 8 3 Cir. 1984).
  • Abshire v. Belmont Homes, Inc. 896 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060, p. 3 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Lakeland Anesth., Inc. v. United Health. of La. 871 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.12/03/03), (quoting Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, 537 U.S. 79, 83-85 , 123 S.Ct.
  • Myers & Sons Enterprises, Inc. v. Young 867 So. 2d 672 La. 2004
    Case remanded to the trial court for reconsideration in light of this Court’s opinion in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Myers & Sons Enterprises, Inc. v. Young 867 So. 2d 673 La. 2004
    Case remanded to the trial court for reconsideration in light of this Court’s opinion in International River Center v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 02-3060 (La.12/3/03), .