Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sims, 851 So. 2d 1039.

35 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
6/27/03), this Court found reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop of a subject in an “area that had recently seen an increased amount of residence burglaries, which, the officers suspected, were being committed in large part by juveniles.” Because when “the officers observed defendant, it was past curfew
State Of Louisiana In The Interest of K.B.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
6127103), State in the Interest of J.H., 2011- 324 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. April Marie Ford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
6/ 27/ 03), ( emphasis added).
State v. Jackson 257 So. 3d 179 La. 2018
State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
6/27/08), the Louisiana State Supreme Court set forth the standard for investigatory stops under the Louisiana and federal constitution: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const. amend.
Parker v. Town of Woodworth 160 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
lailn State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 4-5 (La.6/27/08), , the Louisiana State Supreme Court set forth the standard for investigatory stops under the Louisiana and federal constitution: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const, amend.
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), (discussing a police officer’s decision to conduct a limited pat down for weapons).
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 6 (La.6/27/03), (emphasis added).
State v. Butler 101 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/16/11) , ; see State v. Sims, 2002-2208 (La.6/27/03), (even after a lawful investigatory stop, a police officer may *125 frisk the suspect only where a reasonably prudent person would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others is in danger); La.Code Crim.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JAMES WILLIE WHITE AKA JAMES WILLIE WHITE, JR. AKA JAMES JUNE WHITE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. White 87 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Leday, 930 So.2d at 290 (quoting State v. Sims, 02-2208, pp. 4-5 (La.6/27/03), ).
State ex rel. C.S. 106 So. 3d 93 La. 2012
State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 5 (La.6/27/03), ) (police had reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop based on an apparent curfew violation because defendant looked “very young” although he was in fact 18 years old); State v. Sylvester, 01-0607, p. 5 (La.9/20/02), (“In determining whether police officers have a ‘particularized and
State ex rel. J.H. 83 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Simpson 77 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*453 In State v. Sims, 2002-2208 (La.6/27/03), , the court discussed that a police officer’s authority to frisk a person stopped pursuant to La.
State v. Mulder 76 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Sims, 2002-2208 (La.6/27/2003), (even after a lawful investigatory stop, a police officer may frisk the suspect only where a reasonably prudent person would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others is in danger); State v. Francis, supra; La.Code Crim.
Smith v. City of Shreveport 73 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See State v. Sims, 2002-2208 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 3 (La.6/27/03), -44 , the Court explained that the “officer’s suspicion that he is in danger is not reasonable unless the officer can point to particular facts which led him to believe that the individual was armed and dangerous.” Additionally, “the officer need not establish that it was more probable than not that the detained
State v. Sander 69 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), , the court noted that a police officer’s authority to frisk a person stopped pursuant to La.
State v. Heard 70 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 6 (La.6/27/03), (emphasis added).
State Ex Rel. Jm 30 So. 3d 727 La. 2010
This Court has already ruled that a curfew violation alone, cannot form the basis for a "protective frisk," (see State v. Simms, 02-2208, , (La.6/27/03)).
State ex rel. J.M. 30 So. 3d 727 La. 2010
This Court has already ruled that a curfew violation alone, cannot form the basis for a “protective frisk,” (see State v. Simms, 02-2208, , (La.6/27/03)).
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 6 (La.6/27/03)
State v. Micelotti 979 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Sims, 02-2208, p. 5 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Anthony 971 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 215.1(A); State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Boyer 967 So. 2d 458 La. 2007
1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Temple, 02-1895, p. 4 (La.9/9/03), ; State v. Sims, 02-2208, pp. 4-5 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Parnell 960 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 215.1; State v. Sims, 02-2208 (La.6/27/03), .
State v. Manuel 946 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
The trial court relied upon the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in State v. Sims, 2002-2208, pp. 12-13, (La.6/27/03), , in which the court stated: Based on the language of the statutes and jurisprudence restricting the right of resistance to an actual unlawful arrest, the aforementioned policy considerations supporting Terry stop-and-frisks, namely ensuring officer safety and discouraging violence on the streets, and the origin
State v. Chauvin 945 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
6/27/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained as follows with regard to an investigatory stop: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const. amend.
State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In State v. Sims, 02-2208, pp. 4-5 (La.6/27/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained as follows with regard to an investigatory stop: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const. amend.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Tremane Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/27/03), and stated the following: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const. amend.
State v. Frank 883 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
The supreme court considered this argument in State v. Sims, 02-2208, pp. 4-5 (La.6/27/03), , and stated the following: While an arrest requires officers to have probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime, see U.S. Const, amend.
State v. Cowart 862 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
In State v. Sims, 02-2208, 12 (La.6/27/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a person has no right to resist an unlawful pat down search.