Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Santee, 834 So. 2d 533.
- State of Louisiana v. Victor Wayne Loyd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Loyd
274 So. 3d 112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 12/4/02), , 535.
-
State v. Williams
262 So. 3d 337
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 12/4/02), , 534 ; State v. Kahey , (La.
- State v. Williams 225 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Mahogany 191 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Henderson
136 So. 3d 223
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/4/02) , , where this court affirmed the defendant’s conviction for possession of cocaine, but vacated his adjudication as a multiple offender and remanded the matter because the defendant objected to the sufficiency of the evidence to prove the allegations of the multiple bill, and the record failed to contain the multiple bi
-
State v. Edwards
133 So. 3d 132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/04/02), ; State v. Denson, 11-0517, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
-
State v. Biddy
129 So. 3d 768
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/4/02), (citation omitted).
- State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
State v. Hart
80 So. 3d 25
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 12/4/02) , , we held that the defendant was denied a meaningful appeal from his multiple offender adjudication because the exhibits introduced at the *32 hearing were unavailable.
- State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Braziel 968 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Henry
966 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
App. 4th Cir.12/4/02), .
-
State v. Rideau
947 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 12/4/02) , -535 , this Court set forth the test for determining whether a defendant knowingly waived the right to a jury trial: A defendant may waive his right to a jury trial and elect to be tried by the judge.
-
State v. Ambeau
930 So. 2d 54
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 12/04/02) , , this court held that a defendant’s adjudication and sentence under the multiple offender statute had to be reversed in light of the fact that those exhibits introduced by the state at the multiple bill hearing could not be located for the appellate record.
-
State v. Thompson
848 So. 2d 703
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 12/4/02) , : A defendant may waive his right to a jury trial and elect to be tried by the judge.
-
State v. Jones
846 So. 2d 908
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 12/04/02) , , this Court reiterated that “the Louisiana Supreme Court has refused to mandate this method as an absolute rule.” Id.