Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bell, 854 So. 2d 429.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Trae Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 8/6/03), (forty-year sentence not excessive for first offender defendant who stabbed her lover and was charged with second degree murder, but convicted of manslaughter); State v. Jones, 2001-0630, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Gerard Ladmirault La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 8/6/03), (citations omitted)(wherein this Court explained that “when a defendant brings an apparently meritorious motion to quash based on prescription, the State bears a heavy burden of demonstrating either an interruption or a suspension of the time limitation such that prescription will not have tolled.”).
State v. Bowens 156 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , (the defendant, who had no prior convictions, stabbed her lover; she had been charged with second degree murder); State v. Jones, 2001-0630 (La.App.
State v. West 154 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/6/03), ; State v. Franklin, 2010-0792, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jones 144 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/6/03), ; State v. Franklin, 2010-0792, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Kelly 133 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 8/6/03), ; State v. Franklin, 2010-0792, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , (the defendant, who had no prior convictions, stabbed her lover; she had been charged with second degree murder); State v. Jones, 2001-0630 (La.App.
State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 8/6/03), , 434: “When a defendant brings an apparently meritorious motion to quash based on prescription, the State bears a heavy burden of demonstrating either an interruption or a suspension of the time limitation such that prescription will not have tolled.
State v. Patin 95 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 8/6/03), , 434: “When a defendant brings an apparently meritorious motion to quash based on prescription, the State bears a heavy burden of demonstrating either an interruption or a suspension of the time limitation such that prescription will not have tolled.
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , (the defendant, who had no prior convictions, stabbed her lover; she had been charged with second degree murder); State v. Jones, 01-0630 (La.App.
State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , (the defendant, who had no prior convictions, stabbed her lover; she had been charged with second degree murder); State v. Jones , XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , (the defendant, who had no prior convictions, stabbed her lover; she had been charged with second degree murder); State v. Jones, 01-0630 (La.App.
State v. Waldrop 987 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , , Ms. Bell, a first offender, was sentenced to the maximum of forty years for manslaughter.
State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
8/6/03), ; State v. Jones, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 8/6/03) , , the defendant stabbed and strangled her lover during a quarrel.