DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 830 So. 2d 984.

72 citing documents.

  • Cerwonka v. Baker 942 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Williams, 02-898, 02-1030, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • Rodsuwan v. CHRISTUS HEALTH NORTHERN LOUIS 930 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), ; Future Trends LLC v. DeGeorge, 05-355 (La.App.
  • Supreme Services and Specialty Co., Inc. v. Sonny Greer, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Supreme Servs. and Spec. Co. v. Sonny Greer 930 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    See Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.3; and see State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The State contends the supreme court allowed evidence of an accused's commission of other sexual offenses prior to the effective date of Article 412.2 in State v. Williams, 02-898, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Judson v. Davis 916 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Williams, 02-1030, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. White 907 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.11/30/04), , citing State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Young 902 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [16] State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Fasola 901 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [15] State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Girod 892 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • Thompson v. the Animal Hosp. 889 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), ; Albe v. Louisiana Workers' Comp.
  • State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Donaldson 880 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    *42 Additionally, in State v. Williams, 2002-1030, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[t]he general rule established by this Court is that issues not submitted to the trial court for decision will not be considered by the appellate court on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Additionally, I am not going to give the limiting instruction because I don’t think it’s 9 required by 412.2 and, particularly, the case of State of Louisiana versus Williams, in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana indicated that no limiting instruction is required.
  • State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Additionally, I am not going to give the limiting instruction because I don't think it's required by 412.2 and, particularly, the case of State of Louisiana versus Williams, [ (La.2002) ], in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana indicated that no limiting instruction is required.
  • State v. Armour 874 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In support, the state cites State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), , for the proposition that constitutional issues are not an exception to the general rule that appellate courts will not consider issues not submitted to the trial court for decision.
  • CITY OF BROUSSARD VERSUS MICHAEL WATKINS/dba Michael's International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    We also note that there is no pleading challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance contained in the record before us. In State v. Williams, 02-0898, 02-1030, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), the supreme court stated: The general rule established by this Court is that issues not submitted to the trial court for decision will not be considered by the appellate court on appeal.
  • City of Broussard v. Watkins 869 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    We also note that there is no pleading challenging the constitutionality *969 of the ordinance contained in the record before us. In State v. Williams, 02-0898, 02-1030, p. 7 (La.10/15/02), , the supreme court stated: The general rule established by this Court is that issues not submitted to the trial court for decision will not be considered by the appellate court on appeal.
  • State v. Olivieri 860 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), -987 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the transcript of the committee hearing of Act 1130 that enacted Article 412.2 and explained the purpose of the article as follows: Act 1130 was prompted primarily by two decisions of this Court, State v. McArthur, 97-2918 (La.10/20/98), , and State v. Ken
  • State v. Buckley 839 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    We note State v. Williams, 02-1030, 02-898 (La.10/15/02), , in which the court stated that generally issues not argued at trial will not be reviewed on appeal.