Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gallo v. Gallo, 861 So. 2d 168.
-
Sarah Allen Davidson v. Terrance Hardy
La. 2026
12/3/03), -74 (recognizing the traditional and historical position of Louisiana jurisprudence to zealously guard and enforce the presumption created by Article [185]).
-
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
12/3/03), State, Dep’t of Child.
- Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie
167 So. 3d 573
La. 2015
See also Pociask v. Moseley, 13-0262 (La.6/28/13), ; Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), ; T.D.
-
State Department of Children & Family Services ex rel. J.C. v. Charles
131 So. 3d 1054
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that, although the child support payments were made to the mother, they were made for the benefit of the child, and the mother is under no obligation to refund the monies.
-
Pociask v. Moseley
122 So. 3d 533
La. 2013
Citing our decision in Gallo v. Gallo, 03-794, pp. 7-8 (La.12/3/03), -74 , the court reasoned it must strictly apply the articles governing disavowal actions.
-
State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support Ex Rel. K.B.D. v. Drew
70 So. 3d 1011
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/03/03), -74 , the Louisiana Supreme Court elaborated on the purpose of the presumption of paternity and the applicable time period for bringing the action found in La.
-
D. K. P. v. T. G. L.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
12/3/03), the ex-husband found out he was not the father of the child and requested a refund of $22,125 paid on behalf of the child.
-
Dkp v. Tgl
33 So. 3d 1006
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), , the ex-husband found out he was not the father of the child and requested a refund of $22,125 paid on behalf of the child.
-
D.K.P. v. T.G.L.
33 So. 3d 1006
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), , the ex-husband found out he was not the father of the child and requested a refund of $22,125 paid on behalf of the child.
-
J.M.Y. v. R.R.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
12/3/03), a man sued his ex- wife to recover money he paid as child support for a child born during the marriage 3 that he learned years later was not his biological daughter.
-
Jmy v. Rr
1 So. 3d 725
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), , a man sued his ex-wife to recover money he paid as child support for a child born during the marriage that he learned years later was not his biological daughter.
-
J.M.Y. v. R.R.
1 So. 3d 725
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-0794 (La.12/3/03), , a man sued his ex-wife to recover money he paid as child support for a child born during the marriage |4that he learned years later was not his biological daughter.
- Michael Joseph Viator v. Wendell R. Miller, Indiv. as in His Capacity as Judge for the 31st Judidical … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Viator v. Miller
900 So. 2d 1135
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
See Gallo v. Gallo, 03-794 (La.12/3/03), .
-
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU
887 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Id.; Gallo v. Gallo, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
-
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
887 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Id.; Gallo v. Gallo, 2003-0794, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
-
Mark M. Simmons v. La. Dept. of Pub. Saf. & Correct., Office of Motor Vehicles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
12/3/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: This court's recognition of peremption as a concept distinct from prescription formed the basis of enactment by the legislature in 1982 of LSA-C.C.
-
Simmons v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Office of Motor Vehicles
872 So. 2d 650
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
*654 In Gallo v. Gallo, 03-794, p. 8 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: This court’s recognition of peremption as a concept distinct from prescription formed the^ basis of enactment by the legislature in 1982 of LSA-C.C.