Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Talbot v. Talbot, 864 So. 2d 590.

80 citing documents.

Yachet McLauren Versus Carmiko Dixon McLauren La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Crescent City Property Redevelopment Association, LLC D/B/A Crescent City Property Services and Crescent City Property Redevelopment Services, Inc. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
In Re: Adam Christopher Strain La. 2025
12/12/03), (explaining that in civil cases a party who has the burden of proof must prove the fact in issue by a preponderance of the evidence, and only in exceptional controversies is the clear and convincing standard applied).
Jarvis Ballard v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Melodye Patterson Nee Tanner v. Gary Edward Patterson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
12/12/03), In re Succession of Holcomb, 47,979 (La.
Gabrielle V. Porter v. Dylan L. Porter La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
12/12/03), State in Interest of A.H., 51,053 (La.
Cody Douglas Bagwell v. Susan Brooke Bagwell La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
12/12/03), State in Interest of A.H., 51,053 (La.
In the Matter of the Succession of Loyce Spurlock Scott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Tiffany Nielsen v. Nakia Nielsen La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Succession of Carolyn Gauthier Bargeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Elizabeth B. Downey v. Kenneth A. Downey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J. Alexander La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Wilbert Jones v. State Of Louisiana La. 2023
Succession of John L. Cazenave, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
James Middleton Huger v. Stephanie Goliwas Huger La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Patricia Matthews v. Big Easy Janitorial, L.L.C., and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurers Fund La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Darlene Morris Fair v. Steven Joseph Fair La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Joshua Christopher Smith v. Laura Babin Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p.798 (2d ed.1972)) ].
In Re: Interdiction Of Eunice Lirette Gambino C/w Calvin J. Gambino, Jr. And Cynthia A. Gambino, As Curator … La. 2021
Mary C. Vinet Versus Russell M. Vinet La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
12/12/03), for the proposition that, once a party shows that 20-CA-387 7 separate funds are deposited into a community account then the burden shifts to the other party to show that the community did not use those funds.
Larry Sylvester Cola, Jr. v. Tonya Leatherman Cola La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
J. A. D. v. K. B. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
12/12/03), ( and McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b), p.798 (2d ed.1972))].
Graver v. Leach 264 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Berthelot v. Berthelot 254 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Starks v. Starks 250 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Danae Marie Guillot Starks v. Bradley Dyson Starks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
McLaughlin v. McLaughlin 247 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Glenn Paul Maturin v. Gale Marie Bourgeois Maturin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of L.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
12/12/03), Pearce v. Medallion Const., 36,351 (La.App.
Vedros v. Vedros 229 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Neivens v. Estrada-Belli 228 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/12/03), , 600, the court held the spouse rebutting the presumption must do so by a preponderance of the evidence.
Southland Entertainment, Inc. D/B/A Bed Niteclub & Lounge v. Louisiana Department of Revenue, Office of Alcohol and Tobacco … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Southland Entm't, Inc. v. La. Dep't of Revenue, Office of Alcohol & Tobacco Control 248 So. 3d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Bulloch v. Bulloch 214 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. A.H. 206 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
12/12/03), ; Pearce v. Medallion Const., 36,351 (La.
Louisiana Board of Ethics In re Great Southern Dredging, Inc. 195 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Civ.Code art. 2351 (“A spouse has the exclusive right to manage, alienate, encumber, or lease movables issued or registered in his name as provided by law”); Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814 (La.12/12/03), -02 (where the court analyzed the evidence presented to determine if the wife met her burden of establishing the separate nature of certain stock).
Succession of George D. Carprenter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Fulco v. Fulco 183 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Chris opposed the motion, urging that there was no legal or factual error and that Debra did not meet her burden of proving what part of the commingled assets was hers, as required by Talbot v. Talbot, 2003-0814 (La.12/12/03), .
Dennis Laroy Smith v. Debra Perkins Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), the supreme court established that the preponderance of evidence standard was to be utilized to rebut the presumption of community pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2340.
Judy Johnson Vidrine v. Robert Blake Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In Talbot v. Talbot, 03-814 (La.12/12/03), the supreme court established that the preponderance of evidence standard was to be utilized to rebut the presumption of community and further provided a framework for the trial court in its application.
Politz v. Politz 149 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Talbot v. Talbot, 2003-0814 (La.12/12/03), , citing Katherine S. Spaht & W. Lee Hargrave, 16 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Matrimonial Regimes § 3.32, at 122 (2nd ed.1997).
Shaheen v. Khan 142 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 2/28/96), , writ denied, 96-1057, 96-1072 (La.6/21/96), , superseded by statute on other grounds, Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814, p. 9 (La.12/12/03), .
LeGardeur v. Coleman 131 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814 (La.12/12/03), .
Succession of Schmolke 119 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814, p. 12 (La.12/12/03), (“As a matter of public policy and in the interest of fairness, we find that the community presumption contained in Article 2340 is rebuttable by either spouse upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence the separate nature of property brought into the community.”) Because the Bursts offered no evidence to
Succession of Holcomb 117 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Talbot v. Talbot, 2003-0814 (La.12/12/03), .
Hebert v. Schexnayder 113 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814, pp. 9-10 (La.12/12/03), ; Harper v. Harper, 33,452, p. 6 (La.App 2d Cir. 6/21/00), .
Mulkey v. Mulkey 108 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
“Clear and convincing evidence” means a standard more than a “preponderance,” but less than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Under this standard, the existence of the disputed fact must be “highly probable,” or “much more probable than not.” Talbot v. Talbot, 2003-0814 (La.12/12/03), ; (La.App.
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 103 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Cf. Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814 (La.12/12/03), (where the court considered the application of a clear and convincing burden of persuasion in the absence of a statutory directive).
McClanahan v. McClanahan 82 So. 3d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Talbot v. Talbot, 03-0814 (La.12/12/03), , the Court held: "As a matter of public policy and in the interest of fairness, we find that the community presumption contained in article 2340 is rebuttable by either spouse upon a showing by a preponderance of the evidence the separate nature of property brought into the community.” .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by