DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite CT Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 861 So. 2d 156.

72 citing documents.

  • Munch v. Backer 63 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 1853; see also C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 2003-1003, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State ex rel. D.L.W. 56 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    art. 1853, Revision Comment (b); C.T. Traina Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza Inc., 2003-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • J4H, L.L.C. v. Derouen 49 So. 3d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Sperandeo v. OSABAS 33 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Dexter Mitchell v. Artcrete, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Mitchell v. ARTCRETE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 3/31/04) , , writ denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), ; C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Anderson v. Houston 22 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    art. 1853, Revision Comment (b); C.T. Traina Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza Inc., 2003-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Lawrence v. Julian 17 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • J & R ENTERPRISES-SHREVEPORT, LLC v. Sarr 989 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Carter v. DP & L TIMBER 944 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/31/04) , , writ denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), ; C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Ronald J. Carter v. Dp & L Timber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/31/04), writ denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03)
  • Murphy v. Kavanaugh 940 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Staten v. McNeal 930 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Mr. Staten cites C.T. Traina Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), , to buttress this position.
  • Opti-Flow, LLC v. Production Services International,ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 3/31/04), writ denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03)
  • Opti-Flow, LLC v. Production Services International, Ltd. 903 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 3/31/04) , , unit denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), ; C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Leslie Leday v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Leday v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. 888 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/31/04) , , writ denied, 04-1042 (La.6/18/04), ; C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Joshua Terrell, Indiv. Etc. v. Town of Merryville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/3/03), -60, the supreme court stated: The well settled jurisprudence establishes that an admission by a party in a pleading constitutes a judicial confession and is full proof against the party making it.
  • Terrell v. Town of Merryville 886 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The majority’s reliance on C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), is misplaced.
  • Dr. Ulka Ramelow v. State of La., Board of Trustees, McNeese State Univ. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/3/03), supports its position that the remark made by Dr. Ramelow’s counsel during his opening statement regarding manipulation of her APRs is a judicial confession that the APR is the only basis of her claim that McNeese violated the EPA.
  • Ramelow v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, UNIV. OF LA. 870 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    McNeese asserts that C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., 03-1003 (La.12/3/03), , supports its position that the remark made by Dr. Ramelow's counsel during his opening statement regarding manipulation of her APRs is a judicial confession that the APR is the only basis *419 of her claim that McNeese violated the EPA.
  • Delesdernier v. LA. HEALTH SERV. AND INDEM. 867 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    art. 1853; see also, C.T. Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), .