Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bozeman v. State, 879 So. 2d 692.

53 citing documents.

Nicholas Jude Gregory and Sara Hummel Gregory and Progressive Bank v. Landowners Title of Ouachita L.L.C. and Continental … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Doris Gray v. James Strong, ANPAC Louisiana Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
7/2/04), the court found that from an evidentiary perspective, the collateral source rule barred the introduction of evidence that a plaintiff received benefits or payments from a collateral source independent of the tortfeasor’s procuration or contribution.
Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Rafael Antonio Mena Chavez A/K/A Sergio Balboa, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Children, Ingrid Mena Perez … La. 2024
7/2/04), Thomassie v. Amedisys La Aquisitions, LLC, 20-01229, pp. 1-2 (La.
Congretation of St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Church Versus T2j Partners, LLC (d/B/A Fps Recovery), Shieldtech Roofing Solutions, LLC … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Walter George And Janie George v. Progressive Waste La. 2022
Michael W. Brown v. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company Rise Up Trucking, LLC and Davis James Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Rory Anthony Miller and Jessica Eustis Miller v. Acadian Ambulance Service of New Orleans, L.L.C. and Xyz Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Ashlyn Franks, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Addison Franks v. Joshua Sikes and Louisiana Farm … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Derrick P. Williams v. Lafayette City Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
7/2/04), the supreme court defined the collateral source rule: Under the collateral source rule, a tortfeasor may not benefit, and an injured plaintiff's tort recovery may not be reduced, because of monies received by the plaintiff from sources independent of the tortfeasor’s procuration
Marco Ochoa Versus Brad Aldrete, Aldrete & Sons Shoring Co., Inc. and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Michael L. Thomassie And Linda A. Thomassie v. Amedisys La Aquisitions, Llc D/b/a Metro Preferred Home Care, An … La. 2021
Mohab Said v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Ann Mayer and Russell Mayer, DDS v. Global Energy Services, Inc. of Louisiana; Global Energy Solutions, LLC; David … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
7/ 2/ 04), ); Hoffman v. 21st Century North American Ins.
Michael L. Thomassie and Linda A. Thomassie v. Amedisys La Aquisitions, L.L.C., d/b/a Metro Preferred Home Care, an … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Martin Baack and Brenda Baack v. Michael McIntosh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
7/2/04), ] and Hoffman [v. 21st.
Justin Dewane Pelle v. Eric Munos and GEICO Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Kerry Simmons v. Cornerstone Investments, LLC La. 2019
7/2/04), this court considered whether the collateral source rule applied to medical expenses which were “written off” under the Medicaid program.
Jones v. Fin. Indem. Co. 264 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
7/2/04), ; Louisiana Dept. of Transp.
Allen B. Minix and Kendra Minix, Etc. v. City of Rayne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
7/2/04), we award judgment to Mr. and Mrs. Minix, on behalf of Cora, against the City of Rayne in the amount of $2,105.61 for medical expenses.
Howard v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh 243 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Pamelia Elmer Villa, Individually & O/B/O the Minor Child v. Geico Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
7/2/04), the supreme court cited the fourth circuit’s case of Bryant v. New Orleans Pub.
Villa v. Geico Cas. Ins. Co. 239 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/2/04), , the supreme court cited the fourth circuit's case of Bryant v. New Orleans Pub.
Patterson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 244 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
07/02/04), ; Louisiana Dept. of Transportation and Development v. Kansas City Southern Ry.
Hunter v. Wind Run Apartments, LLC 229 So. 3d 449 La. 2017
7/2/04), ; Hoffman v. 21st Century N. Am.
Eddie Hoffman v. 21st Century North America Insurance Company and Carolyn Elzy 209 So. 3d 702 La. 2015
Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 p. 9 (La.7/2/04), .
Johnson v. CLD, Inc. 179 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Bozeman v. State, 2003-1016 (La.7/2/04), ; Finister v. State ex rel.
Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 22 (La.7/2/04), -06 (holding that "Medicaid recipients are unable to collect the Medicaid 'write-off’ amounts as damages because no consideration is provided for the benefit” and that “plaintiff’s recovery is limited to what was paid by Medicaid.”).
Madrid v. AEP River Operations LLC 151 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Carter ex rel. Blair v. Brothers Lapalco, L.L.C. 118 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
They allege that .the remaining medical bills awarded to plaintiff are “write-off’ amounts to which Ms. Blair is not entitled, citing Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), .
Moore v. Stewart 94 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.07/02/04), .
Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 85 So. 3d 629 La. 2012
2 Turner relies on our opinion in Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), for the proposition that claimant may not recover this written off amount.
Powell v. Chabanais Concrete Pumping, Inc. 82 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Under the collateral source rule, “a tortfeasor may not benefit, and an injured plaintiffs tort recovery may not be reduced, because of monies received by the plaintiff from sources independent of the tortfeasor’s procuration or contribution.” Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), .
Kenneth Duplechain v. Firooz Jalili La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/2/04), is applicable in this case because it holds that a plaintiff cannot recover amounts written off by a medical provider who has reduced its fees due to Medicaid requirements.
Duplechain v. Jalili 52 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In opposing the Duplechains appeal and seeking an affirmation of the trial court’s judgment, the PCF argues that Bozeman v. Department of Transportation and Development, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), , is applicable in this case because it holds that a plaintiff cannot recover amounts written off by a medical provider who has reduced its fees due to Medicaid requirements.
Cutsinger v. Redfern 12 So. 3d 945 La. 2009
The rule provides that “a tortfeasor may not benefit, and an injured plaintiffs tort recovery may not be reduced, because of monies received by the plaintiff from sources independent of the tortfeasor’s procuration or contribution.” Bellard , 07-1335 at p. 18, 980 So.2d at 668 (quoting Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), ).
Mary Cutsinger v. Laura Redfern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Cutsinger v. Redfern 997 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), .
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 980 So. 2d 654 La. 2008
Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), .
Diggs v. Tillman 985 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Bozeman v. *770 State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), ; Louisiana Dep't of Transp.
Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 965 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Moreover, as the State acknowledges in its appellate brief, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Bozeman v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/2/04), -705 , has now specifically held that a plaintiff is unable to recover Medicaid write-off amounts, in that no consideration is given by a patient to obtain Medicaid benefits.
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Bozeman v. State, 03-1016, p. 9 (La.7/2/04), .
Eugene Bellard v. American Central Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Great West Cas. Co. v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 960 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
discussed the Louisiana collateral source rule at length.
Robert Neil Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
7/2/04), a case involving recovery for payments made by Medicaid, should be made applicable to the present matter.
Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center 930 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
They argue that, the supreme court's decision in Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), , a case involving recovery for payments made by Medicaid, should be made applicable to the present matter.
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Defendants also argue the jury's award of medical expenses that were billed but not actually paid is in contravention of Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), .
Betty D. Vaughn v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Vaughn v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
& Dev., 03-1016, p. 1 (La.7/2/04), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by