Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747, 866 So. 2d 228.
-
Trautmann v. Fitzgerald
113 So. 3d 429
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dauzat v. Cumest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Stewart Title of Louisiana v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
112 So. 3d 949
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hutchison v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 8 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Billie Sam v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2/20/04), Hardy v. Bowie, 98–2821, (La.
-
Babino v. Jefferson Transit
110 So. 3d 1123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Mansoor v. Jazz Casino Co.
98 So. 3d 795
La. 2012
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Sheffie v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC
92 So. 3d 625
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Newsome v. Homer Memorial Medical Center, 10-0564 (La.4/9/10), -03 (per curiam) (holding that depositions and affidavits considered must be “on file” prior to the hearing on the motion for summary judgment); Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), (holding that “[ajffidavits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgment must be filed into evidence at the hearing on the motion or filed into the record in order for the affidavits to be part o
- Kathy A. Darbonne, Et Ux. v. Bertrand Investments, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Bickham v. Lammico
90 So. 3d 467
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 966; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 5 (La.2/20/04), ; Harris v. Sternberg, 01-1827, p. 4 (La.App.
-
Bates v. Louisiana National Guard Armory
86 So. 3d 21
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
509 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996); Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 2003-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Batiste v. Brown
86 So. 3d 655
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council 5747, 2003-1583 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Boye v. Daiquiris & Creams No. 3, Inc.
80 So. 3d 505
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Eisenhardt, supra at 544-45 (citing Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. La.
-
Daigle v. City of Shreveport
78 So. 3d 753
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 2003-1533 (La.02/20/04), ; Moore v. Oak Meadows Apartments, 43,-620 (La.App.2d Cir.10/22/08), .
-
Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL
66 So. 3d 528
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1583, p. 9 (La.2/20/03), .
-
McGee v. Mutter
67 So. 3d 517
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533, p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Monier v. St. Charles Parish School Board
65 So. 3d 731
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 7 (La.2/20/04); .
-
Warren v. Kenny
64 So. 3d 841
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*846 “When sufficient time has been allowed for discovery, the courts will assess the proof submitted by the parties, equally without the former presumption in favor of trial on the merits, in order to dismiss meritless litigation.” Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 5 (La.2/20/04), n. 2 .
-
Sandoz v. Bourgeois
64 So. 3d 322
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 7 (La.2/20/04); .
-
Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC
58 So. 3d 534
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 2008-1583 (La.2/20/04), ; Moore v. Oak Meadows Apts., 43,620 (La.App.
-
Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. Tufts
61 So. 3d 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 2003-1533, p. 8 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Cusimano v. Port Esplanade Condominium Ass'n
55 So. 3d 931
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 5 (La.2/20/04), n. 2 ; Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181, p. 7 (La.2/29/00), .
- Dwight Phillips and Joy Phillips, Indiv., Etc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Phillips v. Lafayette Parish School Board
54 So. 3d 739
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
- Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
49 So. 3d 529
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Glass v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
50 So. 3d 832
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 7 (La.2/20/04); .
-
Pertuit v. Tenant Louisiana Health Systems
49 So. 3d 932
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, pp. 4-5 (La.2/20/04), ; La.
-
Gunderson v. F.A. Richard & Associates
44 So. 3d 779
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Pruitt v. Nale
46 So. 3d 780
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
-
Clark Gunderson, M.D. v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04)
-
Beckham v. Jungle Gym, L.L.C.
37 So. 3d 564
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
art. 966; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Ezeb v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
50 So. 3d 166
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2004), .
- Saylor v. VIGUET 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96)
-
McManus v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
33 So. 3d 412
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Shuff v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
32 So. 3d 1030
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
art. 966; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Adonis Cole Weeks v. Sunstream, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/20/04), Gladney v. Milam, 39,982 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/05)
-
Gatlin v. KLEINHEITZ
34 So. 3d 872
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), (holding that “[ajffida-vits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgment must be filed into evidence at the hearing on the motion or filed into the record in order for the affidavits to be part of the record on appeal.” (Emphasis added.)).
- Moreno Properties Two, LLC v. Acadiana Investment Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Moreno Properties Two, L.L.C. v. Acadiana Investment Group, L.L.C.
25 So. 3d 232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
J. Caldarera & Co. v. St. James Parish Hospital Service District
28 So. 3d 1112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Crawley v. Coastal Bridge Co. Inc.
24 So. 3d 315
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 574-7, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
-
Brooks v. Minnieweather
16 So. 3d 1244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus Council 5747, 2003-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Gladney v. Milam, 39,982 (La.App.
-
Eisenhardt v. Snook
8 So. 3d 541
La. 2009
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging, Inc., 08-0528 (La.12/2/08), ; Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
- Arrow Financial Services, Lla v. Carol E. Sorrell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC v. Sorrell 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Jeansonne v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.
8 So. 3d 613
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 2003-1533 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Monterrey Center, LLC v. Ed.ucation Partners, Inc.
5 So. 3d 225
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; see Boland v. West Feliciana Parish Police Jury, 03-1297 (La.App.
-
Dauzat v. Curnest Guillot Logging Inc.
995 So. 2d 1184
La. 2008
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, 03-1533 at p. 9 (La.2/20/04), ; Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University , 95-1466, 95-1487 at p. 11 (La.5/10/96), .
-
Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/20/04), the supreme court stated that “[a]ffidavits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgment must be filed into evidence at the hearing on the motion or filed into the record in order for the affidavits to be part of the record on appeal.” New Hampshire argues that Denoux v. Vessel Mgmt.
-
Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.
997 So. 2d 774
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Furthermore, in Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, p. 4 (La.2/20/04), , the supreme court stated that "[a]ffidavits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgment must be filed into evidence at the hearing on the motion or filed into the record in order for the affidavits to be part of the record on appeal."