Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 874 So. 2d 90.

203 citing documents.

Paradise v. Al Copeland Investments, Inc. 22 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
But compare Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 3 n. 4 (La.4/14/04), , 95 n. 9; (Lemmon.J., dissenting).
Lewis v. La Adrienne, Inc. 17 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Durfee v. Durfee 12 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Tompkins v. Savoie 10 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Detraz v. Lee, 05-1263, p. 7 (La.1/17/07), , citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Holly & Smith Architects, Inc., 2006-0582 at p. 9, 943 So.2d at 1045 ; Louisiana Municipal Association v. State, 2004-0227, p. 35 (La.1/19/05), ; Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 10 (La.4/14/04), .
Billy Kibodeaux v. Progressive Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
(citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), ).
Kibodeaux v. Progressive Ins. Co. 4 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), ).
Stone v. Entergy Services, Inc. 9 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, p. 10 (La.4/14/04), .
Yount v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 4 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 10 (La.4/14/04), .
Hansford v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER, INC. 999 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
In Re Succession of Theriot 4 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), -9 .
Bravo v. Borden 3 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, p. 7 (La.4/14/04), .
Barringer v. Robertson 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Barnett v. Saizon 994 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, p. 10 (La.4/14/04), -99 .
Nelson v. Nelson 985 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Appellant cites for this proposition Hall v. Folger Coffee Company, 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Deloris Powell v. Broadway Grocery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Bynog v. Valenzuela 978 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. , 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Joseph M. Bynog, Jr. v. John Valenzuela La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04)
Dowles v. Conagra, Inc. 980 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Tunnard v. Simply Southern Homes, LLC 985 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
(on rehearing); Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC 980 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
State v. Hamilton 982 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
This Court applied the factors set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), , for determining a Nullity Action based on insufficient service of process.
Henry Sanders v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04)
Sanders v. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 973 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Alex Guillard v. Copeland's of New Orleans, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Guillard v. Copeland's of New Orleans, Inc. 971 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Charles McKelvey, Jr. v. City of Dequincy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4/14/04), citing Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis, 03-0136 (La.
McKelvey v. City of Dequincy 970 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee, Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), , citing Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis, 03-0136 (La.10/21/03), .
Merial Ltd. v. Lagraize 971 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), ; State ex rel.
State Department of Social Services ex rel. S.S. 968 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
*201 In Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04); , the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the following method for determining a Nullity Action based on insufficient service of process: 1.
Gutierrez v. Moezzi 957 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted the distinction between general sufficiency of evidence and legal sufficiency of evidence in Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), , 98-99: In civil cases, the appropriate standard for appellate review of factual determinations is the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, which precludes the setting aside of a district court's finding of fact unless that finding is clearly wrong in light of the record reviewed in its entirety.
Fleming v. Town of Jean Lafitte 953 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Rabalais v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 950 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Hall v. Folger Coffee Company, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
Wright v. Bennett 924 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Hall v. Folger Coffee Company, XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.4/14/04), .
Zimko v. American Cyanamid 905 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
See Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), (citing Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/21/03), )(holding the applicable standard of review in addressing the sufficiency of the evidence is manifest error).
Christopher Handy, Etc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4/14/04), (citation omitted).
Handy ex rel. Handy v. Union Pacific Railroad 896 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Accordingly, the party attacking service must prove that, more probably than not, proper service was not made.” Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, pp. 6-7 (La.4/14/04), (citation omitted).
Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp. 895 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
HANDY EX REL. HANDY v. Union Pacific R. Co. 896 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, pp. 6-7 (La.4/14/04), (citation omitted).
Louisiana Municipal Association v. State 893 So. 2d 809 La. 2005
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX p. 9 (La.4/14/04), .
Crescent City Const., Inc. v. Camper 898 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), -99 ; Bordelon v. Sayer, 811 So.2d at 1235 .
William Anderson, Sr., Et Ux. v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Anderson v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance 890 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), .
Williams v. Maritime, Inc. 889 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
Devonna Fauntleroy v. Rainbow Marketers & in Solido La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Fauntleroy v. Rainbow Marketers 888 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 03-1734 (La.4/14/04), .