Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mary Moe, LLC v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics, 875 So. 2d 22.

73 citing documents.

Richard C. Bentley v. Bobby Fanguy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Bentley v. Fanguy 48 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), .
Louisiana Granite Yard, Inc. v. La Granite Countertops, L.L.C. 47 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), .
Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux 39 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Mary Moe, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 2003-2220, pp. 10-11 (La.4/14/04), ; -69 (La.App.
Joseph L. Savoy v. Bayou Plaquemine & Wickoff Gravity Drainage District La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/14/04), (citations omitted), our supreme court set forth the standard of review applicable to the issuance of a permanent injunction: The standard of review for the issuance of a permanent injunction is the manifest error standard.
Savoy v. Bayou Plaquemine & Wickoff Gravity Drainage District 25 So. 3d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Mary Moe, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 03-2220, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), (citations omitted), our supreme court set forth the standard of review applicable to the issuance of a permanent injunction: The standard of review for the issuance of a permanent injunction is the manifest error standard.
East New Orleans Neighborhood Advisory Commission v. Levy Gardens Partners 2008, LLC 20 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Accordingly, “a preliminary injunction may be issued on merely a prima facie showing by the plaintiff that he is entitled to relief.” Mary Moe, LLC v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 2003-2220 (La.4/14/04), ; see also La.
Fern Creek Owners' Ass'n v. City of Mandeville 21 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
of Ethics, 03-2220, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), .
FAIRWAY ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. Jordan 15 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
of Ethics, 03-2220, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), .
Deerfield Hunting Club, Inc. v. Swayze Plantation, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4/14/04), the supreme court set forth the standard of review applicable to the issuance of a permanent injunction: The standard of review for the issuance of a permanent injunction is the manifest error standard.
Deer Field Hunting Club v. Swayze Plantat. 998 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
OPINION In Mary Moe, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 03-2220, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), , the supreme court set forth the standard of review applicable to the issuance of a permanent injunction: The standard of review for the issuance of a permanent injunction is the *1239 manifest error standard.
Sandra L. Sawyer v. Leroy J. Kilchrist La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Med Life Emergency Med.
Sawyer v. KILCHRIST 996 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), ; Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Med Life Emergency Med.
Ghannam v. City of Alexandria 957 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), ; Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Med Life Emergency Med.
Mahmoud M. Ghannam v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4/14/04), Metro Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Med Life Emergency Med.
Cathcart v. Magruder 960 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
of Ethics, 03-2220, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), .
State MacHinery v. Iberville Council 952 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), , the court stated the following: In this case, the parties agreed to a consolidation of the trial on the merits and the rule of the preliminary injunction.
ETHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. McKay 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Derbes v. City of New Orleans 941 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Mary Moe, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 03-2220 (La.4/14/04), , citing Werner Enterprises, Inc. v. Westend Dev.
Ramsey's Mfg. Jewelers, Inc. v. Ramsey 924 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
of Ethics, 03-2220, p. 9 (La.4/19/04), .
Bank One, Nat. Ass'n v. Velten 917 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Of Ethics, 03-2220, (La.4/14/04), .
Parish of East Feliciana v. Guidry 923 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
[2] Mary Moe, L.L.C. v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 2003-2220, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), ; Hughes v. Muckelroy, 97-0618 (La.App.
Metro Ambulance Serv. v. Med Life Emergency 900 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
of Ethics, 2003-2220 (La.2004), .