DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 865 So. 2d 79.

18 citing documents.

  • Patsy Sylvester Barbier v. Kraft Foods La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    1/30/04), and Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Barbier v. Kraft Foods 158 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), , and Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Hargrave v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 54 So. 3d 1102 La. 2011
    3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), , the court of appeal held that “[a]ny fringe benefit that an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient’s pay unless that fringe benefit is specifically excluded by the law.” 5 Thus, the Sterling court concluded the OWC did not err in including paid holiday and vacation fringe benefits when ca
  • Gloria Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    1/30/04), Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), ; Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Gwendolyn Rochester v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/1/03), writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), this court stated that “[a]ny fringe benefit that an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient's pay unless that fringe benefit is specifically excluded by the law.
  • Rochester v. SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 36 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), , this court stated that “[a]ny fringe benefit that an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient’s pay unless that fringe benefit is specifically excluded by the law.
  • Cherry D. Cotton v. First Fleet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    1/30/04), Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Cotton v. First Fleet 7 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), ; Batiste v. Capitol Home Health, 96-799 (La.App.
  • Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center 980 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), , this court stated that "[a]ny fringe benefit that an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient's pay unless that fringe benefit is specifically excluded by the law.
  • Wanetta Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1/30/04), this court stated that “[a]ny fringe benefit that an employer provides is taxable and must be included in the recipient’s pay unless that fringe benefit is specifically excluded by the law.
  • Richard Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1/30/04), 2 On October 31, 2003, Asplundh applied for writs of certiorari to the supreme court seeking a reversal of one relatively minor aspect of this court’s earlier ruling.
  • Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 886 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), .
  • Ricky Gibson v. Shaw Global Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    1/30/04), a panel of this court noted that in order to succeed in a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, a claimant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an accident occurred on the job site and that an injury was sustained.
  • Gibson v. Shaw Global Energy Services 885 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), , a panel of this court noted that in order to succeed in a claim for workers' compensation benefits, a claimant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an accident occurred on the job site and that an injury was sustained.
  • Kerry Anderson Doumite v. Kvhp - Fox 29 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Doumite v. KVHP-FOX 29 884 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 10/1/03) , writ denied, 03-3017 (La.1/30/04), .
  • Wolfman, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 874 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/1/03) , -719 , writ denied, 2003- *265 3021, 2003-3026, (La.1/30/04), , 80.