Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, 903 So. 2d 392.

90 citing documents.

  • Charles Robert Carter Properties, Inc. v. EcoScience Resource Group, L.L.C. 35 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
  • State v. 2003 Infiniti G35 VIN JNKCV51E93MO24167 27 So. 3d 824 La. 2010
    See Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, 2003-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Zip Tube System of Louisiana, Inc. 30 So. 3d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), , 406 n. 13.
  • Marino v. Parish of St. Charles 27 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    1/19/05), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • State v. Smith 20 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), n. 5 (on rehearing).
  • In Re Morvant 15 So. 3d 74 La. 2009
    Const. Art. V, § 5(A); Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-0450, p. 1 (La.4/27/07), ; Unwired Telcom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, pp. 7-8 (La.1/19/05), ; Murphy v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc., n. 1 (La.
  • Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center 24 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-0450, p. 1 (La.4/27/07), ; Unwired Telcom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, pp. 7-8 (La.1/19/05), ; Murphy v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc., n. 1 (La.
  • Pierre v. Louisiana S.W. Transportation, Inc. 14 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 2003-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Dozier v. Rhodus 17 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, (La.1/19/05), ; Matthews v. Horrell, 06-1973 (La.App.
  • Explained Rogoz v. Tangipahoa Parish Council 21 So. 3d 923 La. 2009
    Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc., 06-2923 (La.2/2/07), ; Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Hood v. Cotter 5 So. 3d 819 La. 2008
    See, e.g., Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), (on reh’g).
  • In Re Freeman 995 So. 2d 1197 La. 2008
    Const. art. V, § 5(A); Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), (on reh'g).
  • Mitch David Bourque v. Tomas Drake La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1/19/05), -04, the supreme court explained: The state’s governmental powers are divided into three separate branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
  • Bourque v. Drake 995 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-732, pp. 14-15 (La.1/19/05), -04 , the supreme court explained: The state's governmental powers are divided into three separate branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
  • Lewis v. Four Corners Volunteer Fire Dept. 994 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government 982 So. 2d 795 La. 2008
    See, e.g., Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), (addressing constitutional issues under the court's supervisory jurisdiction).
  • Criticized Matthews v. Horrell 977 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Mark Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Co. 964 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Taylor v. Clement 947 So. 2d 721 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc. 947 So. 2d 719 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Taylor v. Clement 947 So. 2d 732 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc. 947 So. 2d 727 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Taylor v. Clement 947 So. 2d 730 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, *732 p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc. 947 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    Mallard Bay Drilling v. Kennedy, 04-1089 (La.6/29/05), ; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing).
  • Larry Curtis v. Branton Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/19/05), the supreme court explained that even when a legislature clearly expresses its intention that a law is interpretive and is to be given retroactive effect, the law will be given prospective effect only if the change impermissibly impedes on the judiciary’s constitutional function of interpreting laws.
  • Curtis v. Branton Industries, Inc. 944 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-732 (La.1/19/05), , the supreme court explained that even when a legislature clearly expresses its intention that a law is interpretive and is to be given retroactive effect, the law will be given prospective effect only if the change impermissibly impedes on the judiciary's constitutional function of interpreting laws.
  • Jeanmarie v. Butler 942 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Malone v. Shyne 937 So. 2d 343 La. 2006
    Const. art. II, §§ 1 & 2; Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, pp. 17-18 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Board of Directors v. All Taxpayers 938 So. 2d 11 La. 2006
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), , Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. Louisiana Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry, 05-0131, p. 15 (La.2/22/06) .
  • Beutler England Clinic (Marie Kershaw) v. Mermentau Rice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/19/05), -04, stating: 5 [Louisiana Civil Code Article 6] provides: In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws apply prospectively only.
  • BEUTLER ENG. CHIRO. CLIN. v. Mermentau Rice 931 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of retroactivity of legislative enactments in the case of Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-732, pp. 14-15 (La.1/19/05), -04 , stating: [Louisiana Civil Code Article 6] provides: In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws apply prospectively only.
  • Louisiana Associated General Contractors, Inc. v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 924 So. 2d 90 La. 2006
    As this Court has stated, “in the exercise of legislative power, the legislature may enact any legislation that the state constitution does not prohibit.” Unwired Telecom, Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • LAGC v. LA Dept. of Agr. and Forestry 924 So. 2d 90 La. 2006
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Succession of Samuel McKay, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • In Re Succession of McKay 921 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Id.; See also Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-732 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Judson v. Davis 916 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), ; see State v. Jackson, 98-0004, p. 5 n. 7 (La.App.
  • Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. v. Kennedy 914 So. 2d 533 La. 2005
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing); Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
    Further, it is appropriate to reiterate our statements in Unwired Telcom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732 (La.1/19/05), ( on reh'g ), in which we stated: [T]he principle of separation of powers leaves no room for the adjudication of cases by the legislature....