DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC, 879 So. 2d 821.

14 citing documents.

  • Joao A. Silva and Camila Dalazah v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • Gibbs Construction, L.L.C. v. National Rice Mill, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    App. 4 Cir. 6/2/04), 834, this Court, in interrupting the meaning of “Occurrence”12 in a CGL policy defined the same as in the Westchester policies, concluded that “the clear weight of authority [Louisiana jurisprudence] in more recent cases considers defects in construction that result in damage subsequent to completion to be a
  • Mann v. Tim Clark Constr., LLC 273 So. 3d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 6/2/04), , 833, this Court surveyed the jurisprudence relating to the issue of the trigger of coverage in CGL policies for construction defects, noting that "the clear weight of authority in more recent cases" supported use of the manifestation theory.
  • Gibbs Constr., L.L.C. v. Nat'l Rice Mill, L.L.C. 238 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Dan Veuleman, Et Ux. v. Mustang Homes, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/2/04), Korossy v. Sunrise Homes, Inc., 94-473 through 94-502 (La.App.
  • Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
    4 Cir. 6/2/04), -834 (defects in construction that result in damage subsequent to completion are "occurrences" under insurance contract when they manifest); Oxner , 34,727 p. 11-12, 794 So.2d at 93 (property damage considered to have occurred when it became manifest, regardless of when the act from which it resulted occurred; ins
  • Mangerchine v. Reaves 63 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4th Cir.6/2/04), , the court extensively surveyed the jurisprudence relating to the issue of the trigger of coverage in CGL policies for construction defects, noting that "the clear weight of authority in more recent cases” supported use of the manifestation dieory.
  • Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 6/2/04) , (manifestation rule on trigger of coverage under liability policy applied to claim for structural defects in house resulting from faulty pile-driving); Oxner v. Montgomery, 34,727 (La.App.
  • Brewster v. Hunter 38 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Stewart Contractors v. Metalpro Indus. 969 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • Thibodaux v. Arthur Rutenberg Homes, Inc. 928 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 6/2/04) , -34 , and cited authority, including William Shelby McKenzie and H. Alston Johnson, III, Insurance Law and Practice § 183, at 370, in 15 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise (2d ed.1996); Oxner v. Montgomery, 34,727 & 34,766, pp. 7-9 (La.App.
  • Lang v. Asten, Inc. 900 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 898 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005