DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boatner, 861 So. 2d 149.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Simuel Shaw Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    12/3/03), as follows: Although this court has found reversible error when material portions of the trial record were unavailable or incomplete, a “slight inaccuracy in a record or an inconsequential omission from it which is immaterial to a proper determination of the appeal” does not require rever
  • State v. Caminita 203 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State in the Interest of J.C.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State ex rel. J.C.R. 157 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Boatner, 03-485, pp. 4-5 (La.12/3/03), -53 .
  • State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Boatner, 03-0485, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Boatner, 03-485, pp. 4-5 (La.12/3/03), -53 .
  • State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    But, as here, where only a small portion of the overall testimony is missing, we must first examine the available record, and decide whether the record “is so inadequate that the defendant’s constitutional right to judicial review is prejudiced.” State v. Boatner, 03-0485, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Boatner, 2003-0485 (La.12/3/03), (defendant had shown no prejudice in omissions in the record during a witnesses’ testimony who had not in fact identified exhibits which were never introduced into evidence and in the defendant’s testimony which was not “perfectly” transcribed but was sufficient for review).
  • State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Boatner, 03-0485 (La.12/3/03), (held defendant had shown no prejudice in omissions in the record during a witnesses’s testimony who had not in fact identified exhibits which were never introduced into evidence and in the defendant’s testimony which was not “perfectly” transcribed but was sufficient for review).
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    12/3/03), -53 (alteration in original).
  • State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    12/3/03), -53 (alteration in original).
  • State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    12/3/03), -53, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Both this court and the United States Supreme Court have made clear that a criminal defendant has a right to a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, particularly where appellate counsel was not counsel at trial.
  • State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Boatner, 03-485, pp. 4-5 (La.12/3/03), -53 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Both this court and the United States Supreme Court have made clear that a criminal defendant has a right to a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, particularly where appellate counsel was not counsel at trial.
  • State v. Chism 3 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    However, “[c]losing arguments are not evidence to be considered by the jury.” State v. Boatner, 03-0485, p. 7 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State v. Neely 3 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Boatner, 03-0485 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Cambre, 05-888 (La.App.
  • State v. Lemeunier 986 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    12/3/03), ; State v. Gant, 06-232 (La.App.
  • State v. Cheatteam 986 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Boatner, 03-485 (La.12/3/03), (Citations omitted).
  • State v. Vincent 978 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
    State v. Boatner, XXXX-XXXX p. 5-6 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State v. Cambre 939 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    12/3/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Swain 900 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Boatner, 03-0485, p. 9 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Jackson, 00-1014, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Boatner, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.12/3/03), .