Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taves, 861 So. 2d 144.

79 citing documents.

State v. Tatum 103 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Caldwell, 46,718 (La.App.2d Cir.11/2/11), .
State v. Colvin 85 So. 3d 663 La. 2012
The pertinent question on appellate review is “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropri *668 ate.” see also State v. Taves, 03-0518, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), (per curiam)(collecting cases).
State v. Caldwell 78 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/03/03); .
State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Shawn Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 1/15/03) , , affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-518 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Cass 61 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/03/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
State v. Morrison 55 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Edward D. Gresham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
12/3/03), this court stated the following: (La.App.
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/03/03), ; State v. Linnear, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 1/15/03), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 2003-0518, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), (per curiam).
State v. Ashley 48 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Freeman, 44,419 (La.App.
State v. Young 42 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Lin-near, supra.
State v. Freeman 34 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Freeman, 44,419 (La.App.
State v. Freeman 13 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Taves, 2003-0518 (La.12/3/03), ; State v. Quiambao, 36,587 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/15/03), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. CSD 4 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/15/03) , , affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), , this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State of Louisiana v. C.S.D. & E.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 1/15/03), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Williams 969 So. 2d 1251 La. 2007
See State v. Taves, 03-0518, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), ("[T]he determination of whether a sentence which otherwise falls within the range of punishment provided by the legislature for a particular offense is excessive, i.e., so disproportionate to the offense that it represents the needless infliction of pain and suffering .
State of Louisiana v. Timothy A. Brannon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 1/15/03), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. Brannon 971 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 1/15/03) , , affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), , this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State of Louisiana v. Clayton James Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/3/03), the court found the defendant’s concurrent sentences of ten years imprisonment for false imprisonment while armed with a dangerous weapon and twenty-five years imprisonment for second degree kidnapping, two years of which were to be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, were not
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
12/3/03), this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 1/15/03) , , affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 03-0518 (La.12/3/03), , this court found a waiver of the twenty-four-hour delay, noting that defense counsel failed to voice an objection even though he was clearly aware that the sentencing was scheduled to be taken up the same day the motion for new trial would be heard.
State v. Smith 879 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Taves, 03-0518, pp. 4-5 (La.12/3/03), -48 .
State v. Rhea 868 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Taves, 03-518 (La.12/3/03), .