DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Parker, 871 So. 2d 317.

80 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    4/14/04), the court held in pertinent part: [I]t is generally settled that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which is to be imposed upon the convicted accused.
  • State v. Thacker 187 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In State v. Parker, 03-924, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), , the court held in pertinent part: [I]t is generally settled that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which is to be imposed upon the convicted accused.
  • State v. Faggard 184 So. 3d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Mizell 182 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Parker, 2003-0924 (La.04/14/04), .
  • State v. Mead 165 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Parker, 03-0924, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), (defendant’s status as a habitual offender is determined as of the date that he commits the charged crime).
  • State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ("A defendant must be sentenced according to sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the commission of the offense.”); State v. Parker, 03-0924, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), (defendant’s status as an habitual offender is determined as of the date he commits the underlying offense).
  • State v. Heine 140 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Mandigo 136 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See State v. Parker, 2003-0924 (La.4/14/04), ; State v. Spano, 41,032 (La.App.2d Cir.8/1/06), .
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Sam 105 So. 3d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Bruce 102 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Parker, 2003-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Leday 97 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Barnes 92 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Enterkin 71 So. 3d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    See, e.g., State v. Parker, 2003-0924 (La.4/14/04), ; State v. Hardy, 36,666 (La.App.
  • State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. BARBAY 985 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1st Cir.3/5/03), , that a defendant should have been sentenced according to the amended provisions of the habitual offender law that were in effect when he was properly adjudicated a third felony habitual offender by the district court, was reversed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in *751 State v. Parker, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Alexander 983 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Parker, 03-0924, pp. 16-17 (La.4/14/04), -27 .
  • State of Louisiana v. James Oliver McKeehan, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    See State v. Parker, 03-924 (La.4/14/04)
  • State v. Spano 936 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In State v. Parker, 2003-0924 (La.4/14/04), , the court explained that a defendant’s habitual offender status is fixed as of the date of the commission of the crime, since this allows defendant’s own acts to establish his status rather than leaving discretion in the hands of prosecuting attorneys.
  • State v. Mead 927 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • In Re Elloie 921 So. 2d 882 La. 2006
    See State v. Parker, XXXX-XXXX p. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), ; State v. Sugasti, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; -131 (La.
  • State v. Pulliam 920 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    See State v. Parker, 03-924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. David James Pulliam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    In State v. Parker, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a habitual offender is to be sentenced under the provisions of La.
  • State v. Stevenson 908 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [15] State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Thomas 904 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Parker, 03-0924, p. 16 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Girod 892 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See, State v. Parker, 03-924 (La.4/14/04), , and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See, State v. Parker, 03-924 (La.4/14/04), , and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Terrell 876 So. 2d 43 La. 2004
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .
  • State v. Muhammad 875 So. 2d 45 La. 2004
    State v. Parker, 03-0924 (La.4/14/04), .