Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Major, 888 So. 2d 798.

85 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
12/1/04), –02, the supreme court explained that: when the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, La.
State Of Louisiana v. Travis Haxford Orso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Demetric Cornell Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
12/1/04), –02, the supreme court explained that: when the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, La.
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Reginald Bradley La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
12/ 1/ 04), - 03; State v. McKinney, 44,269 ( La.
State v. Young 270 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Alexander -Aka- Kevin J. Alexander -Aka- James K. Alexander -Aka- Kevin Alexander, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
12/1/04), -02 (alterations in original).
State v. Alexander 256 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/1/04), , 801-02 (alterations in original).
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
12/1/04), -02, the supreme court explained that: when the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, La.
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
12/1/04), -02 , the supreme court explained that: when the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence, La.
State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Major, 2003-3522, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/04)
State v. Williams 201 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Paul 185 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Major, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Allen 177 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 7 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Major, 2003-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Campbell 171 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Melancon 151 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 7 (La.12/1/04), .
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Lewis 125 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Major, 2003-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Watson 135 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Cedric Charles Edwards AKA Cederic C. Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 7-8 (La.12/1/04)
State v. Edwards 107 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 7-8 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Smith 106 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04); .
State v. 2002 Chevrolet Trail Blazer 104 So. 3d 394 La. 2012
Defendant retained dominion and control over the cocaine by virtue of his dominion and control over the vehicle, State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 8 (La.12/1/04), (“The evidence at trial established that defendant had exercised dominion and control over the cocaine hidden underneath the dashboard of the car by virtue of his dominion and control over the vehicle as the driver and professed renter.”) (citations omitted), and the evidence fairly supported the inference that
State v. Allen 101 So. 3d 41 La. 2012
Defendant’s possession of the car gave him dominion and control over the handgun concealed under the backseat, State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 8 (La.12/1/04), (“The evidence at trial established that defendant had exercised dominion and control over the cocaine hidden underneath the dashboard of the car by virtue of his dominion and control over the vehicle as the driver and professed renter.”), and evidence that the location had traces of cocaine residue detected by t
State of Louisiana v. Demarcus Fobb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 7-8 (La.12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State v. Fobb 91 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 7-8 (La.12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State v. Favorite 97 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 7 (La.12/1/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Chad Tyrone Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Swanzy 96 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Major, 2003-3522 (La.12/1/04), ; State v. Russell, 46,426 (La.App.2d Cir.8/17/11), , writ denied, 2011-2020 (La.2/10/12), .
State of Louisiana v. David F. Pittman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State v. Pittman 85 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Major, p. 6, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Rendrick R. Duke La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2 In the Southern Reporter, it appears West mistakenly put the prior report as which was reversed by the supreme court and remanded to this court in
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Duke 84 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In the Southern Reporter, it appears West mistakenly put the prior report as which was reversed by the supreme court and remanded to this court in .
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
12/1/04), -03: Possession of narcotic drugs can be established by actual physical possession or by constructive possession.
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court discussed factors that may be considered when determining whether an accused was in possession of drugs in State v. Major, 08-3522, pp. 7-9 (La.12/1/04), , 802-08: Possession of narcotic drugs can be established by actual physical possession or by constructive possession.
State v. Nailor 78 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Major, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
| State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 6 (La.12/1/04), (citations omitted).
State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Major, 2003-3522 (La.12/1/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“However, since knowledge is a state of mind, it need not be proven as fact, but rather may be inferred from the circumstances.” State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 8 (La.12/1/04), (citation omitted).
State v. Hunter 41 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“However, since knowledge is a state of mind, it need not be proven as fact, but rather may be inferred from the circumstances.” State v. Major, 03-3522, p. 8 (La.12/1/04), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
See State v. Major, 03-3522 at 8-9 (La.12/1/04)
State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Major, 03-3522 at 8-9 (La.12/1/04), .
State v. Jones 28 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 8-9 (La.12/1/04), ; State v. Lathers, 03-941, p. 6 (La.App.