Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Santiago, 853 So. 2d 671.

19 citing documents.

State v. Dillon 124 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/23/03), , citing State v. De Rouen, 96-0725, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Mathews 109 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. McQuirter 108 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/23/03), , citing State v. De Rouen, 96- *375 0725, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Kitchens 35 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State ex rel. L.L. 23 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Shannon 17 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 7/23/03) , , and stated: In addition to the statutory right to a speedy trial recognized by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. COMADORE 984 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Stevenson 952 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 7/23/03), , and stated, ".
State v. Williams 951 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Dees 950 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Millet 946 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Brown 937 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 7/23/03), , this Court considered all of the Barker factors even though it found that a fifteen-month delay was not presumptively prejudicial.
State v. $107,156 U.S. Currency Seized, from Marlin Morton & Richard Woods 935 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hill 931 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Batiste 904 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Keller 859 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 7/23/03), , and stated: In addition to the statutory right to a speedy trial recognized by La.C.Cr.P.