Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 871 So. 2d 1235.

88 citing documents.

  • State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , the fourth circuit upheld a four-year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.
  • State v. Guilbeau 71 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , the fourth circuit upheld a four-year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.
  • State v. Randall 69 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.App.
  • State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
  • State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Stanfield 56 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
  • State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , ; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.App.
  • State v. Mueller 53 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 .
  • State v. Burton 51 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 (sentence is constitutionally excessive if it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime and is nothing more than purposeless imposition of pain and suffering).
  • State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Turner 50 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
  • State v. Johnson 44 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.App.
  • State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
  • State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Harrison 16 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
  • State v. Jones 7 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. George 4 So. 3d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), ]; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Heath Edward Fusilier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory P. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
  • State v. Fusilier 993 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
  • State v. Robinson 996 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Kirkland 962 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hollins 964 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Thomas 954 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Douglas 952 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 .
  • State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Clay 942 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1238-39: When assessing the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, the appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime char
  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 ; State v. Williams, 2002-1815 (La.App.