Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 871 So. 2d 1235.
-
State v. Guilbeau
71 So. 3d 1010
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , the fourth circuit upheld a four-year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.
-
State v. Guilbeau
71 So. 3d 1020
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , , the fourth circuit upheld a four-year sentence for a defendant convicted of committing second degree battery on another man in the parking lot of a bar, noting that although he was a first felony offender, the defendant had prior misdemeanor convictions and a history of losing control of himself.
-
State v. Randall
69 So. 3d 683
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.App.
-
State v. Scoggins
70 So. 3d 145
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
- State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State v. Stanfield
56 So. 3d 428
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
-
State v. Monroe
53 So. 3d 626
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , ; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.App.
-
State v. Mueller
53 So. 3d 677
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 .
-
State v. Burton
51 So. 3d 841
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 (sentence is constitutionally excessive if it is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime and is nothing more than purposeless imposition of pain and suffering).
- State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Turner
50 So. 3d 836
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
- State v. Johnson 44 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Every
35 So. 3d 410
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04), ; see also State v. Bonicard, 98-0665 (La.App.
-
State v. CASSIMERE
34 So. 3d 954
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 , this Court set forth the standard for reviewing an excessive sentence claim: La.
- State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Harrison
16 So. 3d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
- State v. Jones 7 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. George
4 So. 3d 175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 4 Cir. 3/31/04), ]; State v. Trepagnier, 97-2427 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Heath Edward Fusilier
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/31/04), (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gregory P. Landry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/31/04), (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
-
State v. Fusilier
993 So. 2d 375
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , (the defendant punched the victim, causing him to fall onto the concrete.
- State v. Robinson 996 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- State v. Kirkland 962 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- State v. Hollins 964 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- State v. Thomas 954 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
State v. Douglas
952 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 .
- State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
-
State v. Clay
942 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 3/31/04), , 1238-39: When assessing the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, the appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt of each of the essential elements of the crime char
-
State v. Robert
931 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 3/31/04) , -1240 .
-
State v. Bajoie
899 So. 2d 78
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 3/31/04), -1240 ; State v. Williams, 2002-1815 (La.App.