Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Weary, 931 So. 2d 297.

156 citing documents.

  • State v. Parker 245 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Coleman 249 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Teddy Aguillard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Aguillard 242 So. 3d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Kentrell D. McElroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01)
  • State v. McElroy 241 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4/24/06), ; State v. Neal , 00-0674 (La.
  • State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Patrick Seth Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01)
  • State v. Jones 229 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.
  • State v. Murray 223 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson AKA Corlious Corall Dyson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    4/24/06), cert denied, 549 U.S. 1062, 127 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dyson 220 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel McCoy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01)
  • State v. McCoy 219 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State v. Chambers 212 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Ward 209 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    14:10(1); State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 11 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    “[W]hen the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than vvhether the crime was committed, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.” State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), , quoting State v. Neal, 2000-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “Written motions by co-defendants are presumed to have been made on behalf of all defendants unless the contrary appears.” State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 25 (La.4/24/06), (citing La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Gibson 197 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    14:10(1); State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 11 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Bernard 171 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 36 (La.4/24/06), , cert.
  • State v. Martin 163 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    11/29/06), , (citing State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), , and State v. Neal, 2000-0674 (La.6/29/01), ).
  • State v. Sims 162 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), , cert.
  • State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    the [S]tate is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentifieation.’ ” State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Kelly, 10-0853, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Neal, 2000-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Percy 137 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), , citing State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), , and State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.16/29/01),6 .
  • State in the Interest of E. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01)
  • State ex rel. E.T. 136 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Davis Dwayne Freeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Markell Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    This court has explained: “[M]istrial is a drastic remedy that is warranted only when the defendant has suffered substantial prejudice such that he cannot receive a fair trial.” State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 36 (La.4/24/06), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Isiah Demon Lively La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Lively 153 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Hughes, 05-992, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), (citing State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), , cert.
  • State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The Supreme Court in State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), explains: IfiAs a general rule, the fact that a co-defendant has received a more lenient sentence does not necessarily indicate that the penalty imposed on the defendant is excessive.
  • State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Weary, 2003-3067 p. 17 (La.4/24/06), pet.
  • State v. Dussett 126 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Hughes, 2005-0992, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), (citing State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), ).
  • State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Galle, 11-0930, p. 31 (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State v. Santos-Castro 120 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Identity of Mr. Santos-Castro as the Perpetrator “[W]hen the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.” State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), , quoting State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01)
  • State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), .
  • State v. Taylor 118 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 03-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Galle, 11-0930, p. 31 (La.App.
  • State v. Curtis 112 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Davis 147 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), .
  • State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Weary, 2003-3067, p. 18 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 2000-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .